지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 307 (307page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This is the second year report of the two-year collaborative research entitled ‘A study on alternatives promoting social enterprises for re-vitalizing rural areas and creating jobs in rural areas. This study consists of four sub-research subjects.’
Government has implemented various policies for promoting vitalization of rural areas. However, rural areas have collapsed due to the decrease of population, economic status, and the deficit of fundamental social services. Big businesses, which got benefit from opening market, cling to the pursuit of their profit maximization and close eyes on social responsibility. Recently, several departments of government are implementing various community development policies.
Interests about the social enterprise as a third alternative have been escalated for making structural retardation of rural areas, community vitalization, and the increase of people"s quality of life better. In particular, social enterprise promotion policy of the Ministry of Employment and Labor(MOEL) focused on job creation added “the type of community contribution” to it"s policy purposes. According to this addition, social enterprises will contribute to the development of rural communities. However, similar policies have been propelled by several Ministries such as the promotion of village corporation, community business, and farming and fishing community corporation resulted in the problems of efficiency, complexity, and moral hazard of latent policy beneficiaries.
The purposes of this study are to depict the problems of the promotion policy of social enterprise, to find out policy amendment directions, and to suggest alternatives promoting social enterprises in rural areas. We tried to establish typology of social enterprises based on theoretical base and to find out proper support alternatives based on various rural social enterprises. We also tried to suggest a proper intermediary support organization for rural social enterprises. In addition, we tried to set up business models for rural social enterprises based on business items.
We found out several problems which are needed to be amended in order to promote social enterprise in rural areas. Included are as follows: MOEL"s monopolistic certification system, inefficiency resulted from overlapping similar policies, ignorance of social economic conditions, the shortage of the diversity of supports, the ignorance of spacial distribution, the unsystematic intermediary support organizations, diffused implementation system, and the lower policy capacity of local governments.
We suggested several alternatives to amend the policy system. Included are fostering project localization, applying different and various policy approaches to rural social enterprises, admitting general use of the name of ‘social enterprise’, preparing the second stage support system, differentiating supports from the business types and locations of social enterprises, depicting more social purposes, strengthening security and function of intermediary organizations and the establishment of their legal foundation, and establishing independent institution for social enterprise, and so on.
We also develop some alternatives for developing social enterprises in rural areas. Included are as follows: national and regional networking and connecting regional resources, affirmative market for social enterprises, establishment of special investment funds for rural social enterprises, the expansion of partnership between general businesses and social enterprises, the establishment of advertising system, and the establishment of supporting system for education, consulting, and technology development. These alternatives are focused on the development of social enterprises in rural areas.
Government has implemented various policies for promoting vitalization of rural areas. However, rural areas have collapsed due to the decrease of population, economic status, and the deficit of fundamental social services. Big businesses, which got benefit from opening market, cling to the pursuit of their profit maximization and close eyes on social responsibility. Recently, several departments of government are implementing various community development policies.
Interests about the social enterprise as a third alternative have been escalated for making structural retardation of rural areas, community vitalization, and the increase of people"s quality of life better. In particular, social enterprise promotion policy of the Ministry of Employment and Labor(MOEL) focused on job creation added “the type of community contribution” to it"s policy purposes. According to this addition, social enterprises will contribute to the development of rural communities. However, similar policies have been propelled by several Ministries such as the promotion of village corporation, community business, and farming and fishing community corporation resulted in the problems of efficiency, complexity, and moral hazard of latent policy beneficiaries.
The purposes of this study are to depict the problems of the promotion policy of social enterprise, to find out policy amendment directions, and to suggest alternatives promoting social enterprises in rural areas. We tried to establish typology of social enterprises based on theoretical base and to find out proper support alternatives based on various rural social enterprises. We also tried to suggest a proper intermediary support organization for rural social enterprises. In addition, we tried to set up business models for rural social enterprises based on business items.
We found out several problems which are needed to be amended in order to promote social enterprise in rural areas. Included are as follows: MOEL"s monopolistic certification system, inefficiency resulted from overlapping similar policies, ignorance of social economic conditions, the shortage of the diversity of supports, the ignorance of spacial distribution, the unsystematic intermediary support organizations, diffused implementation system, and the lower policy capacity of local governments.
We suggested several alternatives to amend the policy system. Included are fostering project localization, applying different and various policy approaches to rural social enterprises, admitting general use of the name of ‘social enterprise’, preparing the second stage support system, differentiating supports from the business types and locations of social enterprises, depicting more social purposes, strengthening security and function of intermediary organizations and the establishment of their legal foundation, and establishing independent institution for social enterprise, and so on.
We also develop some alternatives for developing social enterprises in rural areas. Included are as follows: national and regional networking and connecting regional resources, affirmative market for social enterprises, establishment of special investment funds for rural social enterprises, the expansion of partnership between general businesses and social enterprises, the establishment of advertising system, and the establishment of supporting system for education, consulting, and technology development. These alternatives are focused on the development of social enterprises in rural areas.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
연구개요
농촌지역 사회적기업 유형화와 유형별 육성 방안 도출
농촌지역 사회적기업 중간지원조직 육성과 네트워크 활성화
농촌지역 사회적기업 사업 모델 평가와 개선방안
농촌지역 사회적기업 제도개선 및 육성 방안
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
2. 선행연구 검토
3. 연구내용과 방법
[제2장 사회적기업과 지원정책 현황]
1. 사회적기업의 개념과 농촌지역 활성화에 대한 의의
2. 사회적기업 현황
3. 사회적기업 관련정책 및 추진체계
[제3장 농촌지역 사회적기업의 유형과 유형별 발전 과제]
1. 농촌지역 사회적기업 유형화의 목적과 방법
2. 유형화 기본모델과 농촌지역 사회적기업의 주요 유형
3. 농촌지역 사회적기업의 주요 유형별 특성과 정책 수요
4. 유형별 특성을 고려한 농촌지역 사회적기업 발전 과제
[제4장 농촌지역 사회적기업 중간지원조직 육성과 네트워크 활성화]
1. 농촌지역 사회적기업 중간지원조직 연구의 개요
2. 사회적기업 중간지원조직 현황
3. 사회적기업 중간지원조직 실태와 문제점
4. 유럽의 사회적기업 중간지원조직 사례와 시사점
5. 농촌지역 사회적기업 역량강화를 위한 중간지원조직 육성 및 네트워크 활성화 방안
[제5장 농촌지역 사회적기업의 사업모델]
1. 사회적기업 사업모델 연구의 개요
2. 농촌지역 사회적기업의 업종별 사업모델 분석
3. 사업모델 개선 방향과 정책 과제
[제6장 사회적기업 육성 정책의 문제점과 제도 개선 방안]
1. 사회적기업 육성 정책과 추진체계의 문제점
2. 사회적기업 육성 정책과 추진체계 개선 방향
3. 농촌지역 사회적기업 육성 방안
[제7장 결론]
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
사회적기업 역량강화를 위한 중간지원조직 육성과 네트워크 활성화
마상진
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2011
.12
농촌지역 사회적기업의 발전을 위한 지원 및 제도 개선 방안
이규천
,
김창호
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2011
.11
지속가능한 마을기업의 발전방안에 관한 연구
임경수
,
하태영
사회적가치와 기업연구
2013
.06
마을만들기 중간지원조직 운영특성 연구 : 정부-시민사회 관계의 관점에서
박세훈
도시행정학보
2015
.09
한국의 사회적 기업 활성화를 위한 법제도 및 정책적 개선방안
권한용
,
배광효
한양법학
2014
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002802855