지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 263 (263page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In [2012 Public Opinion Survey to Agriculture & Farm village] conducted by KREI in order to support the development of research demands and the establishment of policies, the trend which the opinions of farmers are changed into the positive in "a living in farm village" and the negative in "agriculture" has been shown.
Satisfaction of farm village conditions is continuously increased recently over years. Job satisfaction, however, declines for two consecutive years. In addition, the anxiety to the future has been expressed showing gloomy prospect to agricultural situation after 10 years reaches to two times of hopeful forecast.
9 of 10 citizens answer that agriculture is important in national economy and the government should protect the agriculture but in detailed indicator, the support rating to agriculture & farm village declines. The ratio to approve the function of public interest in agriculture & farm village and the will to pay additional tax are decreased, 6 of 10 citizens have the recognition that "as the open-door is extended, consumers will have benefits", and the loyalties to purchase domestic produced agricultural products that "even the price is high, our agricultural products should be bought" remained to 34.1% dropped recently over three years.
People evaluates that agricultural policy during five years of current government did good in "production based policy" and "returning to farm village policy" and did bad in "the policy of agricultural products price stablization" and "farmers" income stablization policy". It is indicated that people considers the threatening elements of agriculture are "expanding open-door" and "aging of farm village households" and farmers consider "extreme weather condition and the change of planting condition" as a big threat.
As for agricultural policy area which next government should focus the most, citizens answered as in order of agriculture, foods, and farm village, farmers as agriculture, farm village, and foods in order, and specialists as in order of farm village, agriculture, and foods. This has shown the difference in priority.
As for agricultural issues which next government should solve, "aging and insufficient labors" are answered as first and "the gap of income between citizens and farmers" and "the improvement of distribution structure" are also answered as main tasks. As for the distribution of agricultural budget, citizens consider "foods safety" as a priority but farmers "self-sufficiency rate of food" and specialists "global competitiveness of agriculture".
5 of 10 citizens answered to have the will to return to farm village but 44.7% doesn"t know the support policy. Therefore, more active promotion should be made. It is indicated that the gap in satisfactions of living environment and quality of life between citizens and farmers has been largely reduced.
In this survey before the launch of next government, it is recognized a variety of policy needs of farmers who are producers, citizens who are consumers, and specialists. We expect that such opinions would be reflected to the establishment of future visions and policies for agriculture and farm village and therefore, the effectiveness of these policies is to be raised.
Satisfaction of farm village conditions is continuously increased recently over years. Job satisfaction, however, declines for two consecutive years. In addition, the anxiety to the future has been expressed showing gloomy prospect to agricultural situation after 10 years reaches to two times of hopeful forecast.
9 of 10 citizens answer that agriculture is important in national economy and the government should protect the agriculture but in detailed indicator, the support rating to agriculture & farm village declines. The ratio to approve the function of public interest in agriculture & farm village and the will to pay additional tax are decreased, 6 of 10 citizens have the recognition that "as the open-door is extended, consumers will have benefits", and the loyalties to purchase domestic produced agricultural products that "even the price is high, our agricultural products should be bought" remained to 34.1% dropped recently over three years.
People evaluates that agricultural policy during five years of current government did good in "production based policy" and "returning to farm village policy" and did bad in "the policy of agricultural products price stablization" and "farmers" income stablization policy". It is indicated that people considers the threatening elements of agriculture are "expanding open-door" and "aging of farm village households" and farmers consider "extreme weather condition and the change of planting condition" as a big threat.
As for agricultural policy area which next government should focus the most, citizens answered as in order of agriculture, foods, and farm village, farmers as agriculture, farm village, and foods in order, and specialists as in order of farm village, agriculture, and foods. This has shown the difference in priority.
As for agricultural issues which next government should solve, "aging and insufficient labors" are answered as first and "the gap of income between citizens and farmers" and "the improvement of distribution structure" are also answered as main tasks. As for the distribution of agricultural budget, citizens consider "foods safety" as a priority but farmers "self-sufficiency rate of food" and specialists "global competitiveness of agriculture".
5 of 10 citizens answered to have the will to return to farm village but 44.7% doesn"t know the support policy. Therefore, more active promotion should be made. It is indicated that the gap in satisfactions of living environment and quality of life between citizens and farmers has been largely reduced.
In this survey before the launch of next government, it is recognized a variety of policy needs of farmers who are producers, citizens who are consumers, and specialists. We expect that such opinions would be reflected to the establishment of future visions and policies for agriculture and farm village and therefore, the effectiveness of these policies is to be raised.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 조사개요]
1. 조사목적
2. 조사방법
3. 자료처리 및 분석
[제2장 조사결과]
1. 농업정책 전반에 대한 기대와 요구
2. 농업 · 농촌의 가치 인식과 의식변화
3. 농업 · 농촌에 대한 수요와 생활환경 인식
4. 주거환경과 복지수준 인식
5. 농업 · 농촌 생활 전반에 대한 의식변화
[제3장 농정에 대한 건의 및 제안]
1. 자유의견을 통해 제시된 정책 건의 요지
2. 정책 건의를 통해 본 농업 농촌에 대한 기대
[제4장 요약 및 시사점]
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002577879