지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.1
- 수록면
- 1 - 142 (142page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Following the recommendation from the Prime Minister"s Office, this study introduces evaluation guidelines for agricultural ODA projects to enhance and improve their quality. The main objectives to evaluate the agricultural ODA projects are feedback and accountability, and the evaluation principles are impartiality, independence, credibility, usefulness, and partnership.
Targets of these guidelines are the projects implemented by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) and its affiliated organizations. In selecting projects to be evaluated, budget availability, the scale of the projects, and political consideration need to be addressed. The managing body for evaluation will be either MAFRA (in case the projects have been implemented by the Korea Rural Community Corporation or KRC), or the KRC (in case the projects have been implemented by other agents).
Considering that the evaluation in the agricultural sector is only at its beginning stage, it is recommended to focus for now on evaluations which will be performed at the project"s closing period and expost evaluations.
An Evaluation Committee headed by a Director General of International Cooperation of MAFRA needs to be set up to discuss and decide on key issues including deliberation of annual evaluation plans, selection of projects to be evaluated and an evaluation agency, and so on.
This study also introduces some of evaluation or result-based management models as well as guidelines on setting up evaluation indicators to be used in the evaluation process. It is recommended to use a Project Design Matrix (PDM) when a project initiating document is prepared so that the results of the projects can be easily compared with the original status. A baseline survey will be of tremendous importance for this.
Evaluation results need to be reported to the Prime Minister"s Office which takes charge of managing the International Development Cooperation Committee headed by the Prime Minister, and then open to the public through websites. The English abstracts of the reports can be sent to the Network on Development Evaluation of OECD so as to be open to the wider public.
Two levels of tasks will be derived from the evaluations: tasks to be institutionally improved and follow-up management tasks. MAFRA and a project management agent (e.g. the KRC) will work on the former and the latter, respectively.
Targets of these guidelines are the projects implemented by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) and its affiliated organizations. In selecting projects to be evaluated, budget availability, the scale of the projects, and political consideration need to be addressed. The managing body for evaluation will be either MAFRA (in case the projects have been implemented by the Korea Rural Community Corporation or KRC), or the KRC (in case the projects have been implemented by other agents).
Considering that the evaluation in the agricultural sector is only at its beginning stage, it is recommended to focus for now on evaluations which will be performed at the project"s closing period and expost evaluations.
An Evaluation Committee headed by a Director General of International Cooperation of MAFRA needs to be set up to discuss and decide on key issues including deliberation of annual evaluation plans, selection of projects to be evaluated and an evaluation agency, and so on.
This study also introduces some of evaluation or result-based management models as well as guidelines on setting up evaluation indicators to be used in the evaluation process. It is recommended to use a Project Design Matrix (PDM) when a project initiating document is prepared so that the results of the projects can be easily compared with the original status. A baseline survey will be of tremendous importance for this.
Evaluation results need to be reported to the Prime Minister"s Office which takes charge of managing the International Development Cooperation Committee headed by the Prime Minister, and then open to the public through websites. The English abstracts of the reports can be sent to the Network on Development Evaluation of OECD so as to be open to the wider public.
Two levels of tasks will be derived from the evaluations: tasks to be institutionally improved and follow-up management tasks. MAFRA and a project management agent (e.g. the KRC) will work on the former and the latter, respectively.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 필요성
2. 연구의 목적
3. 연구의 범위와 내용, 방법
4. 선행연구 검토 및 연구의 차별성
[제2장 평가기획, 시행 및 결과보고]
1. 개요
2. 평가의 기획
3. 평가관리 및 시행, 결과보고
[제3장 평가모형, 평가지표 및 평가방법]
1. 평가모형
2. 평가지표 개발
3. 평가방법, 분석방법 및 등급화
[제4장 평가 결과의 활용]
1. 평가결과의 공개
2. 평가결과의 환류
[제5장 평가지침(안)]
1. 평가지침의 목차
2. 주요 내용
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
AHP를 이용한 공적개발원조(ODA) 사업의 성과지표 연구 : 산업자원협력개발 지원사업을 중심으로
변상규
산업경제연구
2014
.06
제12장 국제농업개발 협력의 이슈와 대응 전략
허장
,
이대섭
,
안규미
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 기타연구보고
2017
.01
KOICA 농업분야 CSV사업기획을 위한 가치사슬분석법(Value Chain Analysis) 적용방안
김수진
,
이효정
,
오수현
연구보고서
2016
.12
『한국형 ODA 모델』중 농림업 분야 국제협력 프로그램 심화 연구(2차년도)
이대섭
,
허장
,
이윤정
외 6명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2015
.10
ODA 관점에서 본 새마을운동의 범분야(Cross-Cutting) 이슈에 관한 연구 : 부녀회 운영과 산림녹화를 중심으로
지성태
,
이요한
한국지역개발학회지
2016
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002601527