메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이옥재 (숙명여자대학교) 김문덕 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국실내디자인학회 한국실내디자인학회 논문집 한국실내디자인학회 논문집 제23권 제4호
발행연도
2014.8
수록면
94 - 102 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Nowadays when the social and cultural paradigm is changing, the incomplete space is becoming a matter of controversy. In order to figure out the solutions to it, are being held a variety of spatial discourses for spatial essence and meaning to be cleared. Accordingly, this study has tried to seek for any probability to interpret the ontology shown at any traditional space on the ground of Heidegger`s Ontological Thinking Structure which has a considerable impact on Modern Space, whose conclusions are the followings.
First, Heidegger`s ontological space theory, which provided a foundation of Placeness concept, includes not only the character of interdisciplinary learning among philosophy, arts and any related studies but also that of mutual oriental and occidental cultures.
Second, between the thoughts of Heidegger and Lao-tzu are considerable similarities from the methodical viewpoint that materializes the meaning of existence as an essence.
Third, for a convenient interpretation, the ontological spatial concept of Lao-tzu`s philosophy shown at traditional spaces have been categorized into Typology-Incident, Morphology-situation and Topology-meaning generation with Schultz`s Existential Spatial Concept based on Heidegger`s Ontology as a medium. In particular, the meaning generation which materializes the placeness has the trait of being clarified as the product of interactions between incidents and situations.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 본질로서의 존재론적 사유체계
3. 존재론적 관점의 공간적 해석
4. 전통공간에 나타난 존재론적 표현
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-610-002606970