메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정민 (충북발전연구원) 홍성호 (충북발전연구원)
저널정보
충북연구원 지역정책연구 地域政策硏究 第25卷 第1號
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
141 - 161 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Interregional network has been a major factor to understand the expansion of city-regions and connectivity in polycentric regions. These academical trends have been moved to political arenas to attract interregional competition and cooperation in various sectors among regions. In this context, this study analyzes dynamic network of 11 cities and counties within Chungbuk Jurisdiction using the in-out commuting data from Census. To consider diachronic change of interregional connectivity, data ranges from 1995 to 2010.
The analysis results in terms of network form, centrality, and cluster. Firstly, during the research period, the size and volume of the internal network within Chungbuk Jurisdiction become enlarged and strengthened. The number of links between a pair of regions increase and the mean of distance decrease from 1.455 to 1.273. In contrast, the network disparity of peripheral areas such as Danyang, Boeun, Okcheon, and youngdong is getting increasingly worse over the time. Gini′s coefficient has been increased as well.
Secondly, it is in respect of centrality. The distinguish increase of In-degree Centrality is shown up in Jincheon, Eumseong, and Jeungpyeong but In-degree Centrality of these regions has not been increased at the same level. Relatively, centrality of Cheongju is the biggest, specially Out-degree Centrality has been enhanced about 3 times in 2010 compared to in 1995. In addition, there has been no change in-degree and out-degree ordering between 2005 and 2010 among regions. It implies that the existing network is not easily changed without political intervention and network reinforces the tendency of direction and force.
Thirdly, in terms of cluster, Cheongju, Jincheon and Jeungpyeong have a clear tendency to form a group. Boeun has been also enhanced network with Choengju instead of Okcheon and Youngdong. In case of Eumseong, it clustered sometimes with Cheongju, in other times with Chungju.
To meet the social need for balanced development between regions, interregional network and its tendency should be considered and reflected in regional and multi-regional policies.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구 고찰
Ⅲ. 분석의 틀
Ⅳ. 충북 시군 통근통학 네트워크의 특성 분석
Ⅴ. 요약 및 시사점
【참고문헌】

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002503417