메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
전문잡지
저자정보
김원배 (연세대)
저널정보
대한건축학회 건축 建築 第58卷 第8號
발행연도
2014.7
수록면
14 - 17 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Future spatial development in the Korean peninsula is discussed on the basis of internal and external factors that will shape the structure of the Korean peninsula. Two scenarios are employed to deal with high uncertainty embedded in inter-Korean relations: 1) economic integration without political unification; and 2) full unification before 2030. Spatial development in the Korean peninsula will be unfolded in a somewhat different pattern depending on each scenario. In the case of the former, North Korea’s spatial development would be largely dominated by special economic zones designed to develop the economy by attracting foreign investment. As North Korea’s economic reform and opening policies take effects, pockets of growth would emerge in the east and west coastal areas and border areas. However, the multiplier effects of these growth pockets would be spatially and economically limited, compared to the case of full unification. When two Koreas are unified, there would be significant changes in the spatial economy of the Korean peninsula including a largescale restructuring of industries and cities. The most significant would be greatly expanded transport connections between the North and the South and between the Korean peninsula and bordering countries. It means the resurrection of the Korean peninsular as a conduit and hub of economic and cultural exchanges in Northeast Asia. Significant differences between the integration and the unification scenario would reveal in the management of national territory. Economic growth would override other goals in the integration scenario, suggesting potentially harmful consequences of developmentalism. In the case of unification, the expansion of social overhead capital, urban regeneration and environmental management would take priority. Most of all, the Korean unification draws our attention to paradigm shift from competition to collaboration between adjacent countries, cities and regions.

목차

전제
구조적 요인들과 대외 관계
남북한의 공간구조 변화 전망
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-500-001620737