지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.5
- 수록면
- 129 - 137 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Net neutrality has brought about a very active debate in France since 2010. The current legal framework pertaining to this crucial issue for the future of the Internet very much reflects the multiplication of regulators and courts involved in the telecommunications and Internet regulation. ARCEP, the Sector regulator has of course been the most heavily involved since it issued its 2010 “Ten proposals”. Compared to the Korean KCC guidelines, these proposals follow the same goal but with a larger scope, a much more detailed and “hands on” approach. Since then, ARCEP has started to implement some of its monitoring mechanisms with the support of the courts, especially the French Council of State. Net neutrality has also been dealt with by the French Competition Authority in the Cogent vs. France Telecom case, the first case of abuse of dominant power filed against a telecommunications operator by a content provider. Constitutional values are also at stake, since the Constitutional council has been ruling since 2009 that access to the Internet is a key element to effectively implement Freedom of speech. In this complicated legal framework, the Executive - rather critical against ARCEP policy - and the Legislative ? more proactive ? are postponing the preparation of a draft Bill. As a conclusion, this article demonstrates the activism and independence of the sector regulator, and the necessity to broaden Net neutrality to activities beyond data transport, such as device neutrality and search engine neutrality. Finally, it favours lasting regulation given the economics inherent to data transport.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The French Internet regulatory framework, from co-regulation to “coopetition” of regulators
Ⅲ. The Sector Regulatory Framework: ARCEP policy
Ⅳ. The Overarching Legal Framework
V. A Political Opposition between the Regulators and the Government
Ⅵ. Some Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
ARCEP / 2010 / Internet and network neutrality : Proposals and recommendations / Les Actes de l’ARCEP
Rapport relatif à l’avis net neutralitéN°2013-1 du 1er mars 2013
Didier, Michel / 2007 / Infrastructures de transport, mobilité et croissance / Rapport du Conseil d’analyse économique (69)
Report to Parliament and the Government on Net Neutrality
Kosciusko-Morizet / 2009 / Nathalie, La neutralité d’Internet, un atout pour le développement de l’économie numérique , Rapport du Gouvernement au Parlement en application de l’article 33 de la loi n°2009-1572du 17 décembre 2009 relative à la lutte contre la fracture numérique / Secrétariat d’Etat à la prospective et au développement de l’économie numérique
Rapport relatif à l’avis net neutralitéN°2013-1 du 1er mars 2013
Didier, Michel / 2007 / Infrastructures de transport, mobilité et croissance / Rapport du Conseil d’analyse économique (69)
Report to Parliament and the Government on Net Neutrality
Kosciusko-Morizet / 2009 / Nathalie, La neutralité d’Internet, un atout pour le développement de l’économie numérique , Rapport du Gouvernement au Parlement en application de l’article 33 de la loi n°2009-1572du 17 décembre 2009 relative à la lutte contre la fracture numérique / Secrétariat d’Etat à la prospective et au développement de l’économie numérique
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001631256