지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Mission is a ministry including various works and multi dimensional goals. Since mission is such an inclusive ministry, we cannot but think of ‘priority’ issue when we carry out mission. Because of this reason, there have been a long conflict between so called ecumenical and evangelical wings in relation to ‘priority’ issue. In these days, of course, both wings use the term ‘wholistic mission’, and thus the matter of priority seems not a problem anymore to the two parties. However, as I mentioned above, priority issuse is still a crucial matter to enhance the efficiency of mission.
This paper investigated a brief survey of the ecumenical mission in relation to ‘priority’ to know the flow of priority issue in ecumenical mission history. Through this study I found out that roughly there were three stages in ecumenical mission theology in relation to priority. First is the period (1910 - 1951) which considered ‘evangelization’ as the top priority of mission. Second is the time (1952- 1974) when ecumenical movement put emphasis on so called ‘humanization.’ Then final (1975 - today) is the period that pursues ‘wholistic mission’ which disregards priority in mission.
The wholistic mission neglecting priority has some strengths and weakness at the same time. It can help us to have a balance between evangelization and social responsibility in mission. This might be a best contribution of the wholistic mission concept. However, I found out some seriousness weaknesses as well. They are the possibility of confusing the concept of mission, the possibility of diminishing efficiency of mission, the possibility of weakening potential of the church, and so on. Since the wholistic mission which does not consider priority has these kinds of various weaknesses, we need to think of the issue of priority seriously to accomplish the goal of world evangelization effectively.
This paper investigated a brief survey of the ecumenical mission in relation to ‘priority’ to know the flow of priority issue in ecumenical mission history. Through this study I found out that roughly there were three stages in ecumenical mission theology in relation to priority. First is the period (1910 - 1951) which considered ‘evangelization’ as the top priority of mission. Second is the time (1952- 1974) when ecumenical movement put emphasis on so called ‘humanization.’ Then final (1975 - today) is the period that pursues ‘wholistic mission’ which disregards priority in mission.
The wholistic mission neglecting priority has some strengths and weakness at the same time. It can help us to have a balance between evangelization and social responsibility in mission. This might be a best contribution of the wholistic mission concept. However, I found out some seriousness weaknesses as well. They are the possibility of confusing the concept of mission, the possibility of diminishing efficiency of mission, the possibility of weakening potential of the church, and so on. Since the wholistic mission which does not consider priority has these kinds of various weaknesses, we need to think of the issue of priority seriously to accomplish the goal of world evangelization effectively.
목차
I. 들어가는 말
II. 에큐메니칼 선교 역사에 나타난 우선순위
III. 우선순위 지양의 음과 양
IV. 나가는 말
< Abstract >
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001632583