지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this essay is to explore feminist ethicists’ criticisms on Reinhold Niebuhr’s thought of sin and Niebuhrian ethicists’ responses. In order to pursue the purpose, the paper reviews some important literatures by Christian feminists, womanist, Hispanic as well as Christian realists. This research leads to the suggestion of the development of a new concept of women’s sin in reflections of the experiences of Korean immigrant women in U.S. society.
Working in the critical literature reviews, “vertical criticism” is employed to explain the critiques of white feminist ethicists directed to Niebuhr’s concept of sin exclusively. Vertical critics argue that Niebuhr’s thought of sin as pride is inappropriate to explain women’ sin based on the unique experience of women. On the other hand, “horizontal criticism” is used to describe the critical and constructive debates between the feminist as vertical critics and Niebuhrian scholars. Horizontal criticism claims that vertical criticism not only misunderstands Niebuhr’s theology but also misrepresents the experiences of the racial minorities. In order to find the applicability of these arguments to the experiences of Korean immigrant women, this paper critically evaluates these “vertical” and “horizontal” debates from the perspective of Korean immigrant women who are suffered from complex discriminatory conditions such as patriarchal ideology from Korean culture and white racism pervasive in U.S. society.
This essay concludes that white feminist arguments are less appropriate than those of womanist and Hispanic ethicists in consideration of the socio-political situations of Korean immigrant women. Therefore, it argues that a concept of women’s sin must be redefined and reconstructed to embrace the experiences of Korean immigrant women in critical consideration of sexism, patriarchism, classism, and racism in unjust social structures.
Working in the critical literature reviews, “vertical criticism” is employed to explain the critiques of white feminist ethicists directed to Niebuhr’s concept of sin exclusively. Vertical critics argue that Niebuhr’s thought of sin as pride is inappropriate to explain women’ sin based on the unique experience of women. On the other hand, “horizontal criticism” is used to describe the critical and constructive debates between the feminist as vertical critics and Niebuhrian scholars. Horizontal criticism claims that vertical criticism not only misunderstands Niebuhr’s theology but also misrepresents the experiences of the racial minorities. In order to find the applicability of these arguments to the experiences of Korean immigrant women, this paper critically evaluates these “vertical” and “horizontal” debates from the perspective of Korean immigrant women who are suffered from complex discriminatory conditions such as patriarchal ideology from Korean culture and white racism pervasive in U.S. society.
This essay concludes that white feminist arguments are less appropriate than those of womanist and Hispanic ethicists in consideration of the socio-political situations of Korean immigrant women. Therefore, it argues that a concept of women’s sin must be redefined and reconstructed to embrace the experiences of Korean immigrant women in critical consideration of sexism, patriarchism, classism, and racism in unjust social structures.
목차
I. 서론
II. 니버의 죄 개념에 대한 비판과 응답
III. 한인 이민 여성들의 경험을 통한 수직적, 수평적 비판의 재평가
IV. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
항암화학요법을 받는 암환자에게 적용한 전화상담이 디스트레스, 불안과 우울 및 치료관련 부작용 발생에 미치는 효과
옥오남
,
남민선
,
이미선
외 4명
Asian Oncology Nursing
2017
.03
파킨슨병 환자의 우울, 불안 및 만성질환에 기대되는 낙인 중재를 위한 전화사용 인지행동치료 효과
배은숙
,
염동문
성인간호학회지
2015
.04
신학과 상황의 변증법 : 라인홀드 니버의 신학과 신학함
배덕만
종교연구
2005
.09
음악요법이 세기조절 방사선치료를 받는 암 환자의 불안, 우울 및 피로에 미치는 효과
최혜영
,
이여진
Asian Oncology Nursing
2013
.12
라인홀드 니버
C. 웰취
기독교사상
1960
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001654492