지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study investigated the optimal number of options of the English section of the NAEA (National Assessment of Educational Achievement) for language domain as well as item characteristics. The English section of the NAEA for the ninth graders is the test instrument employed in this study. By eliminating the least and the second least frequently chosen options, a five-option, multiple choice English test was converted to a four- and a three-option version. Item difficulty, item discrimination, and information function were computed as a function of the number of options, employing the 3-parameter IRT model. Results showed that there were no significant differences among the three means of item difficulty as well as item discrimination indices for language domain (i.e., listening and reading). For specific item types such as identifying the speaker"s intention, selecting the most appropriate response to the spoken discourse, and finding out the true statement presented in English, a three- or a four-option version functioned better than a five-option version. The findings will have important practical implications for implementing some three- or four-option multiple choice items for the English section of the NAEA.
목차
I. 서론
II. 선행연구
III. 실험연구
IV. 결과
V. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 성태제 / 2010 / 문항제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제 / 학지사
2. [보고서] - 이영주 / 2012 / 국가수준 영어 학업성취도 평가의 최적의 선택지 개수 분석
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cizek, G. / 1994 / Further investigation of nonfunctioning options in multiple-choice test items / Educational and Psychological Measurement 54 : 861 ~ 872
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Costin, F. / 1972 / Three-choice versus four-choice items: implications for reliability and validity of objective achievement tests / Educational and Psychological Measurement 32 : 1035 ~ 1038
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Delgado, A. / 1998 / Further evidence favoring three-option items in multiple-choice tests / European Journal of Psychological Assessment 14 : 197 ~ 201
2. [보고서] - 이영주 / 2012 / 국가수준 영어 학업성취도 평가의 최적의 선택지 개수 분석
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cizek, G. / 1994 / Further investigation of nonfunctioning options in multiple-choice test items / Educational and Psychological Measurement 54 : 861 ~ 872
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Costin, F. / 1972 / Three-choice versus four-choice items: implications for reliability and validity of objective achievement tests / Educational and Psychological Measurement 32 : 1035 ~ 1038
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Delgado, A. / 1998 / Further evidence favoring three-option items in multiple-choice tests / European Journal of Psychological Assessment 14 : 197 ~ 201
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-001653450