메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김현덕 (계명대학교) 최근기 (조선대학교) 이지은 (전남과학대학교) 김공 (동신대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제23권 제2호 (인문·사회과학편)
발행연도
2014.4
수록면
47 - 60 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study analyzed countermeasure behavior factors against sexual desire through the view of married participants in sports-for-all and leaded to the conclusion as followings. First, this study analyzed countermeasure behavior factors against sexual desire through the view of married participants in sport-for-all and found three types; type1 and type2 was named ′indirect solution and control pursuit type′, and type3 was named ‘expression and control simultaneous-pursuit type′. Second, this study analyzed the difference among respective types. In type1 and type2, there was difference between the descriptions such as ′I dissolve sexual desire by sexual intercourse with spouses or opposite sex friend′ and ′I bring up pets or insects′; in type1 and type3, there was difference between the descriptions such as ′I dissolve sexual desire with liquor or tobacco′ and ′I dissolve sexual desire by sexual intercourse with spouses or opposite sex friend′; in type2 and type3 there was difference between the descriptions such as ′I cultivate my beauty′ and ′I dissolve sexual desire by sexual intercourse with spouses or opposite sex friend′.
Third, this study analyzed common grounds among three types. As for sexual desire, married participants in sports-for-all was affirmative in controling countermeasure behaviors, but negative in expressive countermeasure behaviors.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-690-001427651