지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 145 - 165 (21page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Seong-Ho not only accepted the previous seience itself as private person 60 more years but also try to criticized the reality of politics, laying stress on the rational innovation of real policies. He didn’t obey blindly ready-made congnition system, because of his objectified attitude for recognition of object, so he pursuited the rational congnition in accordance with reality. This attitude is a kind of characteristics and basic elements of his realistic development in Confucian studies.
Therefore, I’d like to overview interpretation of Confucian classical canons which is basic element of his study.
First, Seong-Ho emphasized that a man who studied the Confucianism ought to rearch for the original Confucianism with the attitude of throughout rearch for original understanding. If possible, as one want to study the classical canons of Confucianism, not only acquainted with the meaning of canons and supporting evidence, but also, not adhere to the previous interpretation.
Second, It was noted that the cardinal point of Seong-Ho’s studies was a means of manage and benefits for practical use, that is to say, ultimate goal in Seong-Ho’s studies was benefit for practical use. I think characteristic of Lee-Yik’s view on the study of classical canons may be not place the purpose of studies on the classical canons itself, rather consider it as a means of study, because his emphasise on the practical use and practice.
This specific feature of Seong-Ho, Lee Yik’s was concreatly appeared in the Mencius(孟子) Jil seu (疾書)for the Four Books(四書). I think The spiritual convention and heresy doctrine of Seong-Ho is actual proof and practical thought.
Here after I think the theme to be researched will be new evaluation for the philosophical thought of Sil-Hak school and continually for more active study.
Therefore, I’d like to overview interpretation of Confucian classical canons which is basic element of his study.
First, Seong-Ho emphasized that a man who studied the Confucianism ought to rearch for the original Confucianism with the attitude of throughout rearch for original understanding. If possible, as one want to study the classical canons of Confucianism, not only acquainted with the meaning of canons and supporting evidence, but also, not adhere to the previous interpretation.
Second, It was noted that the cardinal point of Seong-Ho’s studies was a means of manage and benefits for practical use, that is to say, ultimate goal in Seong-Ho’s studies was benefit for practical use. I think characteristic of Lee-Yik’s view on the study of classical canons may be not place the purpose of studies on the classical canons itself, rather consider it as a means of study, because his emphasise on the practical use and practice.
This specific feature of Seong-Ho, Lee Yik’s was concreatly appeared in the Mencius(孟子) Jil seu (疾書)for the Four Books(四書). I think The spiritual convention and heresy doctrine of Seong-Ho is actual proof and practical thought.
Here after I think the theme to be researched will be new evaluation for the philosophical thought of Sil-Hak school and continually for more active study.
목차
요약문
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 성호의 도통론
Ⅲ. 이단설
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-220-001337514