지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korea initiated its full-fledged market-oriented electricity restructuring in the wake of financial crisis that struck the country in 1997-1998. The neoliberal prescription of privatization and competition in the sector was regarded as a solution for the country"s financial predicament and for future investment in the electricity infrastructure. However, by 2004, the government"s liberalization plan was suspended because of strong opposition from labor unions and dubious results of liberalized electricity markets in other countries, notably California in the U.S. As the law underlying restructuring came to expire in 2009, and complaints about the partially liberalized model mounted, discussion on electricity liberalization was rekindled.
The paper reviews key aspects of the electricity reform debate presented by two antithetical groups, viz, advocates for liberalization and those for reintegration. It argues that the electricity reform debate formulated by these groups has been limited to the conventional "cheap and abundant" energy discourse that predominately focuses on efficiency improvement without adequate consideration of ecological sustainability and democratic energy governance. In this regard, the paper proposes an alternative discourse for electricity sector reforms, called "energy commons paradigm," which shifts from supply-oriented and centralized systems to energy-service-oriented and decentralized local energy regime. Technological, economic and social implications of the change are further explored.
The paper reviews key aspects of the electricity reform debate presented by two antithetical groups, viz, advocates for liberalization and those for reintegration. It argues that the electricity reform debate formulated by these groups has been limited to the conventional "cheap and abundant" energy discourse that predominately focuses on efficiency improvement without adequate consideration of ecological sustainability and democratic energy governance. In this regard, the paper proposes an alternative discourse for electricity sector reforms, called "energy commons paradigm," which shifts from supply-oriented and centralized systems to energy-service-oriented and decentralized local energy regime. Technological, economic and social implications of the change are further explored.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 전력산업구조개편의 간략한 역사
Ⅲ. 시민-노동 사회의 대응
Ⅳ. 구조개편의 지배적 담론 분석
Ⅴ. 대안담론으로서의 Energy Commons Paradigm
Ⅵ. 결론 및 향후 연구과제
참고문헌
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
산유국의 재생에너지정책 결정요인 분석
이정은
,
조용성
에너지경제연구
2015
.09
중국 국민의 헌법상 환경권 보장을 위한 법정책적 방안의 고찰 : 원자력발전소 건설에 따른 환경권 조항 마련을 중심으로
이상만
환경법과 정책
2015
.02
원자력발전소 환경방사능 관리
윤주용
전기저널
2007
.09
원자력발전의 환경적 정치경제적 문제점 : 한국 원자력추진정책의 비판과 새로운 에너지정책의 방향
임성진
정치정보연구
2002
.12
원자력발전소 자력발전소 자력발전소의 물리적 환경요소에 대한 인적요소 관리 방안
김대호
,
이용희
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2006
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0