지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第221輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.3
- 수록면
- 61 - 85 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/khr.2014.03.221.61
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I trace the modern transformation of East Asia which operated across three dimensions, namely, human migration, the trade of goods, and the communication of concepts.
While growing into an empire, Japan tried to deal with its population-food problem by importing food from overseas and exporting its industrial goods. This resulted in the implementation of the ‘rice-cotton exchange system’ in colonial Joseon. Japan thus tried to solve its food shortage by trading transnational goods across regions while alleviating its population overload through colony acquisition or mass deportation of its national members. This shows that the trade of goods and the migration of people were intricately linked.
The concept of ‘Orient(東洋)’ within East Asia was being circulated and communicated in connection with the concept of nation or nationalism. This indicates that the concept of ‘Orient’ was not unrelated with the migration of people or the trade of goods. As the discourse of Asian solidarity(亞細亞連帶論) or Orient discourse on the level of civilization(文明論的 東洋論) emerged throughout East Asia, the ‘Orient discourse’ would have contributed to promoting migration and exchange. On the other hand, when the exclusive aspects of Orient discourse was on the rise, the role of the ‘Orient discourse’ would inevitably have been a negative one.
While growing into an empire, Japan tried to deal with its population-food problem by importing food from overseas and exporting its industrial goods. This resulted in the implementation of the ‘rice-cotton exchange system’ in colonial Joseon. Japan thus tried to solve its food shortage by trading transnational goods across regions while alleviating its population overload through colony acquisition or mass deportation of its national members. This shows that the trade of goods and the migration of people were intricately linked.
The concept of ‘Orient(東洋)’ within East Asia was being circulated and communicated in connection with the concept of nation or nationalism. This indicates that the concept of ‘Orient’ was not unrelated with the migration of people or the trade of goods. As the discourse of Asian solidarity(亞細亞連帶論) or Orient discourse on the level of civilization(文明論的 東洋論) emerged throughout East Asia, the ‘Orient discourse’ would have contributed to promoting migration and exchange. On the other hand, when the exclusive aspects of Orient discourse was on the rise, the role of the ‘Orient discourse’ would inevitably have been a negative one.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘이주’하는 동아시아
Ⅲ. ‘교역’하는 동아시아
Ⅳ. ‘소통’하는 동아시아
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001325408