지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The paper divides greatly into a three part and compares the thought of the hentae and the Giljang also considering in the same way. The two thinkers established he thought system to represent China. I could discover following some result fact to the comparison and the analysis. I arranged these as follows.
In the first, the two thoughts construct logic systems on the basis with all Sam Je theories(三諦說: The method of three kind recognition) Especially, It are characterized to contain that the conception of Kong(空) and Jung(中) in the notion of Ga(假) among Sam Je(三諦) of Kong, Ga Jung(空假中). But it is true that delicate difference in the consilience and demonstration.
In the second, the inclination of the two thoughts affirm the actuality. The above all, it induce the great conversion of the cognition. It exists some difference each but also it does not recognize to separate the world of the enlightenment with reality. That is why it put stress on the great conversion of the cognition through the training commonly.
In the third, the two thoughts interpret the real facts in the middle path with Nirvana, body of Dharma and Nature of Buddha in the variety. They take up the position in the Kong of the non-attachment. Such a thing that mutuality harmony of the phenomenon and true nature(體用相卽) can decide to be established on the basic thought tradition.
In the forth, the two thoughts have many point of difference in spite of many external point of sameness. Especially, The Giljang is showing intimacy of Lao-zi(老子) and Zhuang-zi(莊子) thought with centering three theories and the Chentae is recognized to merge the theory of Prajna, Lotus sutra and Avatamska on the thought base of the China tradition.
In the first, the two thoughts construct logic systems on the basis with all Sam Je theories(三諦說: The method of three kind recognition) Especially, It are characterized to contain that the conception of Kong(空) and Jung(中) in the notion of Ga(假) among Sam Je(三諦) of Kong, Ga Jung(空假中). But it is true that delicate difference in the consilience and demonstration.
In the second, the inclination of the two thoughts affirm the actuality. The above all, it induce the great conversion of the cognition. It exists some difference each but also it does not recognize to separate the world of the enlightenment with reality. That is why it put stress on the great conversion of the cognition through the training commonly.
In the third, the two thoughts interpret the real facts in the middle path with Nirvana, body of Dharma and Nature of Buddha in the variety. They take up the position in the Kong of the non-attachment. Such a thing that mutuality harmony of the phenomenon and true nature(體用相卽) can decide to be established on the basic thought tradition.
In the forth, the two thoughts have many point of difference in spite of many external point of sameness. Especially, The Giljang is showing intimacy of Lao-zi(老子) and Zhuang-zi(莊子) thought with centering three theories and the Chentae is recognized to merge the theory of Prajna, Lotus sutra and Avatamska on the thought base of the China tradition.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 천태와 길장의 논리체계
Ⅲ. 천태의 삼제원융론과 길장의 해탈론이 지닌 지향점
Ⅳ. 천태와 길장의 사상적 동이점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001388119