메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Russell Pittman (New Economic School, Moscow)
저널정보
에너지경제연구원 에너지경제연구 에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호
발행연도
2014.3
수록면
145 - 178 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
South Korean policy makers have been sold a defective product. Seeking to address frightening long-term forecasts of electricity demand outpacing supply, the National Assembly adopted in 2000 a supply-side restructuring policy package that was in fact not well suited to address this particular problem in the best of circumstances, and especially poorly suited to the Korean situation of expensive imports of fuels. The imbalances that were forecast have increasingly come to pass, and current proposals to resume the restructuring package, which was halted in 2004, are likewise unlikely to provide much help for the actual problems at hand.
This paper argues that in the special circumstances faced by Korea, the most urgent electricity sector reforms are on the demand side?in particular, real-time pricing for large customers and prices reflecting costs for the industrial sector?and that in this setting the supply-side focus on “vertical separation” and the creation of wholesale generation markets may be a costly distraction, in fact liable to make things worse rather than better.

목차

요약
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Electricity Sector Reform: The Broader Context
Ⅲ. Electricity Sector Reform in South Korea
Ⅳ. A Flawed Idea from the Start?
Ⅴ. Moving Forward: Demand-Side Measures, Restructuring But Not(Necessarily) Competition
References

참고문헌 (63)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-320-001353080