지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study purported to examine the theoretical and methodological issues related to intrinsic (I) and extrinsic (E) religiosity. The I&E concepts which were constructed to explain “prejudice” involved value judgement that ‘intrinsic’ is good, desirable, & mature and ‘extrinsic’ is bad, undesirable, & immature. And then, the prejudice was attributed to the extrinsic religiosity. However, The empirical research in Korea conducted by me has shown different results from Allport & Ross and followers. Then, I need global data for evaluating cultural specificity or universality of those results that I have found. Empirical data collected from 36 countries over the world were used to test these hypotheses.
The analysis showed that the results found in Korean samples are quite universal. Then, some theoretical ideas and empirical hypotheses related to the initial I&E concepts should be revised. First, I&E religiosity are not conflicting and exclusive, but complementary to each other. And there are no good or no bad religiosity with respect to I & E. Second, both I&E religiosity are positively related to each other. Positive and rather high correlations between I&E were found in all countries(average r=0.36, p＜0.001). Third, contrary to All port & Ross, and other researchers` claims, intrinsic contributed to high exclusivism and extrinsic to tolerance, relatively. Then, the initial value judgement of the ‘good or bad’ for explaining religious prejudice should be given up. Fourth, the indiscriminately pro-religious group showed high religious exclusivism in all countries. This results has a great implication that religious beliefs are likely to be connected to inner-group preference and other-group antagonism, that is, exclusivism.
These findings showed that I &E concepts and measures are still useful to explain social phenomena like religious exclusivism. They have pretty good explanatory power with respect to individual`s attitude and behaviors. But we just need to get rid of value judgement (good or bad and mature or immature) in theory construction and hypothesis derivation related to I&E concepts.
The analysis showed that the results found in Korean samples are quite universal. Then, some theoretical ideas and empirical hypotheses related to the initial I&E concepts should be revised. First, I&E religiosity are not conflicting and exclusive, but complementary to each other. And there are no good or no bad religiosity with respect to I & E. Second, both I&E religiosity are positively related to each other. Positive and rather high correlations between I&E were found in all countries(average r=0.36, p＜0.001). Third, contrary to All port & Ross, and other researchers` claims, intrinsic contributed to high exclusivism and extrinsic to tolerance, relatively. Then, the initial value judgement of the ‘good or bad’ for explaining religious prejudice should be given up. Fourth, the indiscriminately pro-religious group showed high religious exclusivism in all countries. This results has a great implication that religious beliefs are likely to be connected to inner-group preference and other-group antagonism, that is, exclusivism.
These findings showed that I &E concepts and measures are still useful to explain social phenomena like religious exclusivism. They have pretty good explanatory power with respect to individual`s attitude and behaviors. But we just need to get rid of value judgement (good or bad and mature or immature) in theory construction and hypothesis derivation related to I&E concepts.
목차
Ⅰ. 이끄는 말
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 조사방법
Ⅳ. 분석결과
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001212596