지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 259 - 278 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Parody is, primarily, the proof of communication made between writer and phenomena. A set of processes of the author’s experience coming up as subjective values and being born as text must be much the same way in poetic creation. With a different poetic trend by the times, now in the 2000’s, abstruse poems have appeared as a premise for characteristic, which seems to have given up the will toward communion with the reader. When the utility of the poetic genre has lost the times, reader, will toward discourse and communication ability, we must sense an immediate crisis that literature may be killed. However, the outdated fetters about creation for a pure text come to degrade many poems as a simple parody. In such conflict, inflexible orientation about a pure text shakes the poet’s path of creation.
Parody is both the proof and doubt about technicality. The genre of parody shows the pain of the times nakedly at the surface hiding the agony of the subject or making it disappear. Since writhing for acceptance of the parody doesn’t simply cover the work of adopting the original text and its imitation, it is time we discuss the essential value of the parody text passing over the job of collating it with the original text. This study was intended to look at the author, ‘choice’ of the subject and its necessity through the recent works that can be considered parody and prove that behind the choice lies the purpose of communication all the time. After all, this study was conducted with the purpose of finding the author’s will toward communication between the times and the masses. It is expected that the definition of parody and work on the method of communication will be of help in diagnosing the present and future of the modern poems and discussing the value of parody as a creation and its aesthetic value.
Parody is both the proof and doubt about technicality. The genre of parody shows the pain of the times nakedly at the surface hiding the agony of the subject or making it disappear. Since writhing for acceptance of the parody doesn’t simply cover the work of adopting the original text and its imitation, it is time we discuss the essential value of the parody text passing over the job of collating it with the original text. This study was intended to look at the author, ‘choice’ of the subject and its necessity through the recent works that can be considered parody and prove that behind the choice lies the purpose of communication all the time. After all, this study was conducted with the purpose of finding the author’s will toward communication between the times and the masses. It is expected that the definition of parody and work on the method of communication will be of help in diagnosing the present and future of the modern poems and discussing the value of parody as a creation and its aesthetic value.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 고발적 담론 의지와 비전형적 형태화
Ⅲ. 주체의 자각과 거리두기
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
현대소설의 패러디 양상 연구 : 박완서의 〈엄마의 말뚝 1>과 김애란의 〈큐티클>을 중심으로
방금단
돈암어문학
2014
.12
동ㆍ서양 영상콘텐츠에 적용된 패러디 비교 연구 : 한ㆍ미ㆍ일 3국의 GameㆍAnimation을 중심으로
문만기
,
장성갑
다문화콘텐츠연구
2007
.12
오정희 소설에 나타난 ‘여성’ 정체성의 체화와 수행 : 〈유년의 뜰〉, 〈중국인 거리〉, 〈저녁의 게임〉을 중심으로
김지혜
페미니즘 연구
2017
.10
현대시의 매체 수용과 효과
김신정
한국근대문학연구
2013
.10
콘텐츠의 패러디를 통한 네티즌의 자기표현 전략 : 〈강남스타일〉 패러디 영상을 중심으로
김정우
인문콘텐츠
2013
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-001-001215258