지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: This study aims to present literature providing researchers with insights on specific fields of research and highlighting the major issues in the research topics. A systematic review is suggested using content analysis on literatures regarding "visual search", "eye movement", and "eye track".
Background: Literature review can be classified as "narrative" or "systematic" depending on its approach in structuring the content of the research. Narrative review is a traditional approach that describes the current state of a study field and discusses relevant topics. However, since literatures on specific area cover a broad range, reviewers inherently give subjective weight on specific issues. On the contrary, systematic review applies explicit structured methodology to observe the study trends quantitatively.
Method: We collected meta-data of journal papers using three search keywords: visual search, eye movement, and eye track. The collected information contains an unstructured data set including many natural languages which compose titles and abstracts, while the keyword of the journal paper is the only structured one. Based on the collected terms, seven categories were evaluated by inductive categorization and quantitative analysis from the chronological trend of the research area.
Results: Unstructured information contains heavier content on "stimuli" and "condition" categories as compared with structured information. Studies on visual search cover a wide range of cognitive area whereas studies on eye movement and eye track are closely related to the physiological aspect. In addition, experimental studies show an increasing trend as opposed to the theoretical studies.
Conclusion: By systematic review, we could quantitatively identify the characteristic of the research keyword which presented specific research topics. We also found out that the structured information was more suitable to observe the aim of the research. Chronological analysis on the structured keyword data showed that studies on "physical eye movement" and "cognitive process" were jointly studied in increasing fashion.
Application: While conventional narrative literature reviews were largely dependent on authors" instinct, quantitative approach enabled more objective and macroscopic views. Moreover, the characteristics of information type were specified by comparing unstructured and structured information. Systematic literature review also could be used to support the authors" instinct in narrative literature reviews.
Background: Literature review can be classified as "narrative" or "systematic" depending on its approach in structuring the content of the research. Narrative review is a traditional approach that describes the current state of a study field and discusses relevant topics. However, since literatures on specific area cover a broad range, reviewers inherently give subjective weight on specific issues. On the contrary, systematic review applies explicit structured methodology to observe the study trends quantitatively.
Method: We collected meta-data of journal papers using three search keywords: visual search, eye movement, and eye track. The collected information contains an unstructured data set including many natural languages which compose titles and abstracts, while the keyword of the journal paper is the only structured one. Based on the collected terms, seven categories were evaluated by inductive categorization and quantitative analysis from the chronological trend of the research area.
Results: Unstructured information contains heavier content on "stimuli" and "condition" categories as compared with structured information. Studies on visual search cover a wide range of cognitive area whereas studies on eye movement and eye track are closely related to the physiological aspect. In addition, experimental studies show an increasing trend as opposed to the theoretical studies.
Conclusion: By systematic review, we could quantitatively identify the characteristic of the research keyword which presented specific research topics. We also found out that the structured information was more suitable to observe the aim of the research. Chronological analysis on the structured keyword data showed that studies on "physical eye movement" and "cognitive process" were jointly studied in increasing fashion.
Application: While conventional narrative literature reviews were largely dependent on authors" instinct, quantitative approach enabled more objective and macroscopic views. Moreover, the characteristics of information type were specified by comparing unstructured and structured information. Systematic literature review also could be used to support the authors" instinct in narrative literature reviews.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Conclusion
5. Discussion
References
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cavanagh, P. / 2011 / Visual cognition / Vision research 51 (13) : 1538 ~ 1551
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cipriani, Andrea / 2003 / Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics / Epidemiologia e psichiatriasociale 12 : 146 ~ 153
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Downe-Wamboldt, B. / 1992 / Content analysis: method, applications, and issues / Health care for women international 13 (3) : 313 ~ 321
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Green, Bert F. / 1984 / Quantitative methods for literature reviews / Annual Review of Psychology 35 (1) : 37 ~ 54
5. [단행본] - Koch, C. / 1987 / Matters of Intelligence / Springer : 115 ~ 141
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cipriani, Andrea / 2003 / Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics / Epidemiologia e psichiatriasociale 12 : 146 ~ 153
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Downe-Wamboldt, B. / 1992 / Content analysis: method, applications, and issues / Health care for women international 13 (3) : 313 ~ 321
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Green, Bert F. / 1984 / Quantitative methods for literature reviews / Annual Review of Psychology 35 (1) : 37 ~ 54
5. [단행본] - Koch, C. / 1987 / Matters of Intelligence / Springer : 115 ~ 141
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Mapping Studies on Visual Search, Eye Movement, and Eye track by Bibliometric Analysis
Ye Lim Rhie
,
Ji Hyoun Lim
,
Myung Hwan Yun
대한인간공학회지
2015
.10
Cluster Analysis on User Experience of Smart TV-viewing using SOM (Self-Organizing Map)
Ilsun Rhiu
,
Ye Lim Rhie
,
Gee Won Shin
외 1명
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2015
.04
A Research on Curved Display Comparing to Flat Display Regarding Posture, Tilt Angle, Focusing Area and Satisfaction
Sung Hee Ahn
,
Byungki Jin
,
Sanghyun Kwon
외 1명
대한인간공학회지
2014
.06
A Review of Haptic Perception
Joobong Song
,
Ji Hyoun Lim
,
Myung Hwan Yun
대한인간공학회지
2012
.12
Relationships of Musculoskeletal Disorder Symptoms and Perceived Workload among Hospital Workers
Taebeum Ryu
,
Joobong Song
,
Myung Hwan Yun
외 1명
대한인간공학회지
2012
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-500-001264615