지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 129 - 133 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Guideline of stage II colon cancer chemotherapy is controversial issue. This study aims to assist in making proper guideline of stage II colorectal cancer chemotherapy.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 137 patients who had colorectal cancer surgery and chemotherapy at Sanggye Paik Hospital, Surgical Department from 2008 to February 2013. We analyzed disease-free survival rate (DFS), characteristics and relationship of stage II (II), stage II with lymphatic invasion (IIL), stage III with N1 (lymph mode involvement number under 3).
Results: We found new metastasis in 23 patients (liver 11, lung 5, peritoneum 6, bone 1). There is no difference in DFS between II and IIL (P=0.064). But recurrence more frequently appeared with lymatic invasion group. There is no difference in DFS between IIL and III (P=0.083). But cancer stage had not effect to recurrence (P=0.153). In IIL patients, statistically difference did not be shown between oral and intravenous chemotherapy group (P=0.500). But chemotherapy completion group had higher DFS (P=0.001).
Conclusion: Between II and IIL, DFS did not have difference but low P-value. In consideration of correlation analysis result and DFS between IIL and III, we think their prognosis is not same and completion of chemotherapy influence on good outcome in stage II with lymphatic invasion colon cancer.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 137 patients who had colorectal cancer surgery and chemotherapy at Sanggye Paik Hospital, Surgical Department from 2008 to February 2013. We analyzed disease-free survival rate (DFS), characteristics and relationship of stage II (II), stage II with lymphatic invasion (IIL), stage III with N1 (lymph mode involvement number under 3).
Results: We found new metastasis in 23 patients (liver 11, lung 5, peritoneum 6, bone 1). There is no difference in DFS between II and IIL (P=0.064). But recurrence more frequently appeared with lymatic invasion group. There is no difference in DFS between IIL and III (P=0.083). But cancer stage had not effect to recurrence (P=0.153). In IIL patients, statistically difference did not be shown between oral and intravenous chemotherapy group (P=0.500). But chemotherapy completion group had higher DFS (P=0.001).
Conclusion: Between II and IIL, DFS did not have difference but low P-value. In consideration of correlation analysis result and DFS between IIL and III, we think their prognosis is not same and completion of chemotherapy influence on good outcome in stage II with lymphatic invasion colon cancer.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-510-001101459