지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to study the filmmakers’ interpreting the brief stay of Dr. Sun Yat-sen in Penang in 1910, its differences from that of researchers, and the causes for the differences. The movie Road to Dawn, commonly known Ye Ming 夜明in Chinese, which has been the unique one about Dr. Sun’s brief stay in Penang, has been based on parts of the related academic works which are less popular than this film for the ordinary people. Due to the legendary connections of Dr. Sun’s activities in Penang to the 1911 Chinese Revolution 辛亥革命, the importance and popularity of this film has been enhanced. Few scholars have examined this movie, which has been preoccupied with fictional stories, while many great specialists have discussed Dr. Sun’s stay in Penang. The difference in interpreting Dr. Sun’s stay in Penang between filmmakers and scholars, which are obvious, and the causes for those differences have never been discussed.
There will be 6 parts in this article. Firstly, I would like to scrutinize the process of filmmaking, which lasted 4 years, from the birth of the idea for the film making to the first screening of the film. Secondly, the plot of the movie will be briefly introduced. Thirdly, the article will generally examine what the researchers have done for the trips of Dr. Sun to Penang, one of which those moviemakers have been interested in interpreting. Furthermore, utilizing two case studies respectively concerning the romantic experience of Dr. Sun and his safety in Penang, I would precisely discuss the difference in describing Dr. Sun’s stay in Penang by the filmmakers from that by the researchers. Before the conclusion, the causes for the differences will be approached. The political and economic motives from the filmmakers and their supporters, which are different from the academic perspective, should be responsible for their intentionally misinterpreting. Finally, it will be concluded that it is necessary to make the documentary regarding Dr. Sun’s activities in Nanyang with the cooperation between filmmakers and researchers.
There will be 6 parts in this article. Firstly, I would like to scrutinize the process of filmmaking, which lasted 4 years, from the birth of the idea for the film making to the first screening of the film. Secondly, the plot of the movie will be briefly introduced. Thirdly, the article will generally examine what the researchers have done for the trips of Dr. Sun to Penang, one of which those moviemakers have been interested in interpreting. Furthermore, utilizing two case studies respectively concerning the romantic experience of Dr. Sun and his safety in Penang, I would precisely discuss the difference in describing Dr. Sun’s stay in Penang by the filmmakers from that by the researchers. Before the conclusion, the causes for the differences will be approached. The political and economic motives from the filmmakers and their supporters, which are different from the academic perspective, should be responsible for their intentionally misinterpreting. Finally, it will be concluded that it is necessary to make the documentary regarding Dr. Sun’s activities in Nanyang with the cooperation between filmmakers and researchers.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며 : 연구의 필요성과 문제의식
Ⅱ. ‘난산을 겪은’ 〈夜ㆍ明〉
Ⅲ. 학계연구와 1차 자료
Ⅳ. 페낭에서의 “로맨스”
Ⅴ. 페낭에서의 ‘안전’ 문제
Ⅵ. ‘同床異夢’ : 동일한 대상에 대한 서로 다른 해석의 동기
Ⅶ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-000973324