지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.86 No.1
- 발행연도
- 2014.1
- 수록면
- 28 - 34 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Laparoscopic resection for transverse colon cancer is a technically challenging procedure that has been excluded from various large randomized controlled trials of which the long-term outcomes still need to be verified. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes for transverse colon cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) or open colectomy (OC).
Methods: This retrospective review included patients with transverse colon cancer who received a colectomy between January 2006 and December 2010. Short-term and five-year oncologic outcomes were compared between these groups.
Results: A total of 131 patients were analyzed in the final study (LAC, 84 patients; OC, 47 patients). There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, tumor location, operative procedure, or blood loss between groups, but the mean operative time in LAC was significantly longer (LAC, 246.8 minutes vs. OC, 213.8 minutes; P = 0.03). Hospital stay was much shorter for LAC than OC (9.1 days vs. 14.5 days, P < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were not statistically different between the two groups. In terms of long-term oncologic data, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were not statistically different between both groups, and subgroup analysis according to cancer stage also revealed no differences.
Conclusion: LAC for transverse colon cancer is feasible and safe with comparable short- and long-term outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective review included patients with transverse colon cancer who received a colectomy between January 2006 and December 2010. Short-term and five-year oncologic outcomes were compared between these groups.
Results: A total of 131 patients were analyzed in the final study (LAC, 84 patients; OC, 47 patients). There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, tumor location, operative procedure, or blood loss between groups, but the mean operative time in LAC was significantly longer (LAC, 246.8 minutes vs. OC, 213.8 minutes; P = 0.03). Hospital stay was much shorter for LAC than OC (9.1 days vs. 14.5 days, P < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were not statistically different between the two groups. In terms of long-term oncologic data, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were not statistically different between both groups, and subgroup analysis according to cancer stage also revealed no differences.
Conclusion: LAC for transverse colon cancer is feasible and safe with comparable short- and long-term outcomes.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Fowler DL. / 1991 / Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection / Surg Laparosc Endosc 1 : 183 ~ 188
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. / 2009 / Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial / Lancet Oncol 10 : 44 ~ 52
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Fleshman J. / 2007 / Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial / Ann Surg 246 : 655 ~ 662
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Green BL. / 2013 / Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer / Br J Surg 100 : 75 ~ 82
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Guillou PJ. / 2005 / Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer(MRC CLASICC trial) : multicentre, randomised controlled trial / Lancet 365 : 1718 ~ 1726
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. / 2009 / Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial / Lancet Oncol 10 : 44 ~ 52
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Fleshman J. / 2007 / Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial / Ann Surg 246 : 655 ~ 662
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Green BL. / 2013 / Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer / Br J Surg 100 : 75 ~ 82
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Guillou PJ. / 2005 / Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer(MRC CLASICC trial) : multicentre, randomised controlled trial / Lancet 365 : 1718 ~ 1726
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-510-000984690