지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is obtained by analyzing types of particles that unspecified agent and agent of passives take, and the characteristics of semantic.
After summarizing types of particles that agent takes and their characteristics of sematic, these are followed:
First, if ?に? takes only a case-particle in agent, it means the impact on the Y which is the subject of a passive sentence with an operating entity X, and as the behavior subject and the subject are closely related to each other, it is when the Y in the passive sentence acts as a ?受け手?. And, for verbs of thinking and feelings and emotions, they fulfill their role as the principal action X is realizing the situation still an active sentence, therefore particle ?に? is used in the operation subject X. This moves from the operation subject X to Y, and then ?から? particle can be used to reach Y.
Second, from the standpoint of being a source of coming from action or operation of the X, characteristic of semantic of particle ?から? is that it mainly takes behavior particle ?から? and because it also acts as the operation subject, it is also possible to use particle of ?に?.
Third, characteristics of semantic particle of ?によって? is related to a case of creational consequences where as a result of the intentional behavior subject as a verb of type ?創る?, an incident that has not occurred yet may happen.
Rearranging the characteristics semantics and types of particle that unspecified entity take, cases are in the following.
I found that when X is used as the unspecified subject in the passive sentence, inanimated noun come to X and Y mainly, there is no action or intention to X in the realization of the situation, and it did not have any effect on the target. Therefore, for the particle that is used to the unspecified subject like this, I could see that there are many variations depending on the characteristics of X and Y and the that of semantic of verbs in the statement, and also the characteristics of semantic has been changed.
After summarizing types of particles that agent takes and their characteristics of sematic, these are followed:
First, if ?に? takes only a case-particle in agent, it means the impact on the Y which is the subject of a passive sentence with an operating entity X, and as the behavior subject and the subject are closely related to each other, it is when the Y in the passive sentence acts as a ?受け手?. And, for verbs of thinking and feelings and emotions, they fulfill their role as the principal action X is realizing the situation still an active sentence, therefore particle ?に? is used in the operation subject X. This moves from the operation subject X to Y, and then ?から? particle can be used to reach Y.
Second, from the standpoint of being a source of coming from action or operation of the X, characteristic of semantic of particle ?から? is that it mainly takes behavior particle ?から? and because it also acts as the operation subject, it is also possible to use particle of ?に?.
Third, characteristics of semantic particle of ?によって? is related to a case of creational consequences where as a result of the intentional behavior subject as a verb of type ?創る?, an incident that has not occurred yet may happen.
Rearranging the characteristics semantics and types of particle that unspecified entity take, cases are in the following.
I found that when X is used as the unspecified subject in the passive sentence, inanimated noun come to X and Y mainly, there is no action or intention to X in the realization of the situation, and it did not have any effect on the target. Therefore, for the particle that is used to the unspecified subject like this, I could see that there are many variations depending on the characteristics of X and Y and the that of semantic of verbs in the statement, and also the characteristics of semantic has been changed.
목차
1. はじめに
2. 先行?究の考察
3. 動作主?の助詞の分類特?
4. 不特定主?の助詞の特?
5. 結論
?考文?
논문초록
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 權奇洙 / 1991 / 受動文の動作主マーカーについてのー考察 / 東北大学文学部日本語学科論集 (1) : 65 ~ 79
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김미연 / 2010 / 受動表現における動作主表示「で」の 用法について / 일본언어문화 (16) : 65 ~ 84
3. [단행본] - 孫東周 / 2005 / 日本語の動詞とヴォイス / 제이앤씨 : 233 ~ 264
4. [단행본] - 井上和子 / 1976 / 変形文法と日本語上․下 / 大修館書店 : 75 ~ 88
5. [단행본] - 角田太作 / 1990 / 世界の言語と日本語 / くろしお出版 : 109 ~ 110
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김미연 / 2010 / 受動表現における動作主表示「で」の 用法について / 일본언어문화 (16) : 65 ~ 84
3. [단행본] - 孫東周 / 2005 / 日本語の動詞とヴォイス / 제이앤씨 : 233 ~ 264
4. [단행본] - 井上和子 / 1976 / 変形文法と日本語上․下 / 大修館書店 : 75 ~ 88
5. [단행본] - 角田太作 / 1990 / 世界の言語と日本語 / くろしお出版 : 109 ~ 110
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0