지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The local administrative system in the mid-old period (514-654) of Silla was kun (郡, county) and s?ng/ch’on (城/村, fortress/village) system. It has been regarded as the organization of existing local polities such as kuk (國). Kuk of Samhan was comprised with a few ?mnaks (邑落). It was thought that the structure of kuk and ?mnak was changed into that of kun and s?ng/ch’on. However, s?ng/ch’on where tosa (道使, official) was dispatched can be understood as the local stronghold of Silla state, and kun as the territory where tangju (幢主, commander) drafted soldiers.
After Silla unified three kingdoms, s?ng/ch’on changed into kun or hy?n (縣). The centric stronghold of kun was also called kun, and the rest of them were called hy?n. What was the meaning of the change? The existing theories explain that there was a overall reorganization. However, the boundary of kun rarely changed. The characteristic of Silla’s kun-hy?n system is that all of kun and hy?n had their own territories. Each of them became the stronghold which had a its own territory. In kun and s?ng/ch’on system, tangju and tosa fulfilled different functions, but in kun-hy?n system, the chiefs had their own districts and did the same things at least in there.
The changing process can be divided into two steps: change of structure and refinement of system. First, the overlap of local officials at the centric stronghold of kun started to be gotten rid of. Tangju was not dispatched in the home front, and tosa under tangju was removed in the frontier. As a result, each official took full charge of his distric around the stronghold. It is similar to the structure of kun-hy?n system. After Silla unified three kingdoms, King Simmun refined the system, as it is known.
After Silla unified three kingdoms, s?ng/ch’on changed into kun or hy?n (縣). The centric stronghold of kun was also called kun, and the rest of them were called hy?n. What was the meaning of the change? The existing theories explain that there was a overall reorganization. However, the boundary of kun rarely changed. The characteristic of Silla’s kun-hy?n system is that all of kun and hy?n had their own territories. Each of them became the stronghold which had a its own territory. In kun and s?ng/ch’on system, tangju and tosa fulfilled different functions, but in kun-hy?n system, the chiefs had their own districts and did the same things at least in there.
The changing process can be divided into two steps: change of structure and refinement of system. First, the overlap of local officials at the centric stronghold of kun started to be gotten rid of. Tangju was not dispatched in the home front, and tosa under tangju was removed in the frontier. As a result, each official took full charge of his distric around the stronghold. It is similar to the structure of kun-hy?n system. After Silla unified three kingdoms, King Simmun refined the system, as it is known.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 中古期 郡-城ㆍ村制의 특징
Ⅲ. 郡縣制로의 전환이 의미하는 것
Ⅳ. 전환 과정의 복원
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001060675