지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean direct perceptive evidential -te- is said to introduce two puzzles. First, when it is used without any tense marker, the sentence hosting it is interpreted as past. Second, when it is used with so-called tense markers, such as past -ess- and future -keyss-, -te- introduces the implication similar to what is introduced by inferential evidentials in other languages. In this paper I first show that this apparent puzzle is misleading, by presenting some counterexamples which do not fit to what the ‘puzzle’ says. Then I propose a new lexical entry for -te-, according to which -te- introduces the presupposition that the speaker acquired some direct perceptive evidence before the utterance time, and then infers the prejacent from this direct perceptive evidence. I also show that this analysis accounts for the data in the previous puzzle as well as other data presented in this paper. Finally I point out several problems of previous analyses which are based on this ‘misguided’ puzzle.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. More Examples
3. Proposal and Analysis
4. Comments on Previous Studies
5. Conclusions and Remaining Problems
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
On the Interaction between Lexical Aspects of Predicates and Evidentiality : A situation-semantics account
Dongsik Lim
언어학
2014
.12
A TYPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KOREAN DVIDENTIAL MARKER '-TE-'
JAE-MOG SONG
언어학
2002
.07
On the Inchoative -eci- with Verbs in Korean
Dongsik Lim
언어학
2021
.08
(Lexical) Aspects, Situation Semantics, and Evidentiality
Dongsik Lim
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2016
.06
한국어 보조동사 ‘-(어)지다’에 관한 소고 : 어휘통사론적 접근
임동식
언어
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003366123