지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I compared active model “∼テアル” sentence structure with the “∼テオク” sentence structure, said to expressing the meaning of ‘Maintenance of the effect’ and ‘preparations’, and I considered difference in each co-occurrence environment.
In particular, I pointed out the problem with a conclusion of Chang(2010) which analyzed the comparison about the “∼テオク” sentence structure and All of “∼テアル" sentence structures. I hypothesized that the result will change when I limited a consideration object to only active model “∼テアル” sentence structure, and I performed the comparison analysis of both sentence structures in form to perform an example investigation, and to inspect it.
As a result, it was confirmed that both sentence structures showed an aspect of the co-occurrence environment where they were considerably similar to. Such result was different from Chang(2010) which insisted on “∼テアル” sentence structure and “∼テオク” sentence structure being considerably heterogeneous marks in most items of the co-occurrence environment. For example, in Chang(2010), “∼テアル”sentence structure insisted that there were extremely few ratios to show an agent in comparison with “∼テオク” sentence structure. However, according to the consideration result of this report, I showed around 20% in both sentence structures, and the way of appearing in agents was able to confirm the aspect that they were similar to.
In particular, I pointed out the problem with a conclusion of Chang(2010) which analyzed the comparison about the “∼テオク” sentence structure and All of “∼テアル" sentence structures. I hypothesized that the result will change when I limited a consideration object to only active model “∼テアル” sentence structure, and I performed the comparison analysis of both sentence structures in form to perform an example investigation, and to inspect it.
As a result, it was confirmed that both sentence structures showed an aspect of the co-occurrence environment where they were considerably similar to. Such result was different from Chang(2010) which insisted on “∼テアル” sentence structure and “∼テオク” sentence structure being considerably heterogeneous marks in most items of the co-occurrence environment. For example, in Chang(2010), “∼テアル”sentence structure insisted that there were extremely few ratios to show an agent in comparison with “∼テオク” sentence structure. However, according to the consideration result of this report, I showed around 20% in both sentence structures, and the way of appearing in agents was able to confirm the aspect that they were similar to.
목차
〈Abstract〉
1. はじめに
2. 先行?究の?討及び問題の提起
3. 調査の結果
4. まとめ及び今後の課題
?考文?
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003516247