지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Vol.85 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2013.11
- 수록면
- 236 - 239 (4page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare two different treatment methods for pilonidal sinus with respect to complications, recurrence, and patient quality of life.
Methods: Five hundred forty-nine patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus between January 2007 and August 2012 were included in this study. The patients were classified into group I (excision and primary closure) and group II (Limberg flap).
Results: There was no significant difference in the mean age and gender of the patients between groups I and II (P = 0.512 and P = 0.472). The duration of surgical operation was lower in group I (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time after surgery, minor complications, and recurrence between the groups (P = 0.674, P = 1.000, and P = 1.000, respectively). The time required for pain-free walking, urinating, and returning to work was significantly lower in group II (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The patients in group I stated that they were more satisfied in terms of aesthetics (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, Limberg flap method has better outcomes compared with excision and primary closure. Therefore, we recommend Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
Methods: Five hundred forty-nine patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus between January 2007 and August 2012 were included in this study. The patients were classified into group I (excision and primary closure) and group II (Limberg flap).
Results: There was no significant difference in the mean age and gender of the patients between groups I and II (P = 0.512 and P = 0.472). The duration of surgical operation was lower in group I (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time after surgery, minor complications, and recurrence between the groups (P = 0.674, P = 1.000, and P = 1.000, respectively). The time required for pain-free walking, urinating, and returning to work was significantly lower in group II (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The patients in group I stated that they were more satisfied in terms of aesthetics (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, Limberg flap method has better outcomes compared with excision and primary closure. Therefore, we recommend Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - McCallum IJ / 2008 / Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis / BMJ 336 : 868 ~ 871
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Tocchi A / 2008 / Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture / Am J Surg 196 : 28 ~ 33
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Muzi MG / 2010 / Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease / Am J Surg 200 : 9 ~ 14
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Al-Khayat H / 2007 / Risk factors for wound complication in pilonidal sinus procedures / J Am Coll Surg 205 : 439 ~ 444
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Polat C / 2011 / Is oval flap reconstruction a good modification for treating pilonidal sinuses? / Am J Surg 201 : 192 ~ 196
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Tocchi A / 2008 / Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture / Am J Surg 196 : 28 ~ 33
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Muzi MG / 2010 / Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease / Am J Surg 200 : 9 ~ 14
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Al-Khayat H / 2007 / Risk factors for wound complication in pilonidal sinus procedures / J Am Coll Surg 205 : 439 ~ 444
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Polat C / 2011 / Is oval flap reconstruction a good modification for treating pilonidal sinuses? / Am J Surg 201 : 192 ~ 196
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0