지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper tries to trace the development of main linguistic trends revealed from the examination of the major contributions by the four important linguists Breal, Saussure, Meillet, and Benveniste in the turning period of 20th century in France.
First, Breal, founding father of the comparative historical linguistics in France. introduced the German comparative historical linguistics in France, but he radically turned the form based historical studies into the semantic change with a view to find the general laws which govern our reasoning mind through semantic changes. Here we find a trace inherited from the Port-Royal Grammar.
Then, as Indo-european linguist, Saussure was a founding father of modem structural general linguisitcs and tried to establish linguistics as a science which has its proper object and method, the epistemology of which was influenced by the sociologist Durkheim. The ‘langue’ which he defined as sign system is a social phenomenon, and a language is a meaningful sign in a given society. His general linguistics was very innovative by rejecting the exclusively historical point of view and taking into consideration the general synchronic semiotic view of language for the comparative historical linguistics.
Thirdly, Meillet as pater patriae of French linguistics was deeply imbued with the socio-anthroplogical view of language which made him to find causes and general laws of language (semantic) change in the structure of society. His general linguistics, therefore, an advanced step for the comparative historical linguistics.
Finally, Benveniste explored the language(s) widely in various fields of linguistic phenomena with the socio-anthroplogical, structuralistic, semio-semantic view of language. He is a genuine general linguist of innovative synthesis of his predecessors’ various linguistic studies in France.
The linguistics in France changed very dynamically in this turning period of 20th century due to the great influences from the other adjacent sciences, especially the anthropology and sociology as well as the Zeitgeist or episteme. However, one cannot deny that the French tradition of the rationalistic grammar also had some influence on the later development of the comprative historical linguistics. These intellectual situations might contribute much to the differenciation of the linguistics in France from the German linguistic tradition.
First, Breal, founding father of the comparative historical linguistics in France. introduced the German comparative historical linguistics in France, but he radically turned the form based historical studies into the semantic change with a view to find the general laws which govern our reasoning mind through semantic changes. Here we find a trace inherited from the Port-Royal Grammar.
Then, as Indo-european linguist, Saussure was a founding father of modem structural general linguisitcs and tried to establish linguistics as a science which has its proper object and method, the epistemology of which was influenced by the sociologist Durkheim. The ‘langue’ which he defined as sign system is a social phenomenon, and a language is a meaningful sign in a given society. His general linguistics was very innovative by rejecting the exclusively historical point of view and taking into consideration the general synchronic semiotic view of language for the comparative historical linguistics.
Thirdly, Meillet as pater patriae of French linguistics was deeply imbued with the socio-anthroplogical view of language which made him to find causes and general laws of language (semantic) change in the structure of society. His general linguistics, therefore, an advanced step for the comparative historical linguistics.
Finally, Benveniste explored the language(s) widely in various fields of linguistic phenomena with the socio-anthroplogical, structuralistic, semio-semantic view of language. He is a genuine general linguist of innovative synthesis of his predecessors’ various linguistic studies in France.
The linguistics in France changed very dynamically in this turning period of 20th century due to the great influences from the other adjacent sciences, especially the anthropology and sociology as well as the Zeitgeist or episteme. However, one cannot deny that the French tradition of the rationalistic grammar also had some influence on the later development of the comprative historical linguistics. These intellectual situations might contribute much to the differenciation of the linguistics in France from the German linguistic tradition.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 언어학사 방법론
3. 19, 20세기 전환기 프랑스 언어학의 정황
4. 주요 언어학자의 언어 인식론과 언어학의 방법
5. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (57)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김현권 / 1983 / 에밀벤베니스트의언어관-기호론과의미론 / 경북대인문대학논총 8 : 133 ~ 147
2. [단행본] - 김현권 / 1990 / A. Meillet, E. Benveniste와인구어학, In 신익성교수정년퇴임기념논집 / 한불문화사 : 95 ~ 129
3. [단행본] - 김현권 / 1990 / 언어학사기술과인식론의문제 / 서울대출판부 : 691 ~ 714
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김현권 / 1993 / 현대프랑스언어학현황(1), (2) / 방송대논문집 16 : 145 ~ 189
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김현권 / 1998 / 소쉬르와역사언어학전통(1) - 통)시)론)의분석 / 언어학 19 (22) : 191 ~ 215
2. [단행본] - 김현권 / 1990 / A. Meillet, E. Benveniste와인구어학, In 신익성교수정년퇴임기념논집 / 한불문화사 : 95 ~ 129
3. [단행본] - 김현권 / 1990 / 언어학사기술과인식론의문제 / 서울대출판부 : 691 ~ 714
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김현권 / 1993 / 현대프랑스언어학현황(1), (2) / 방송대논문집 16 : 145 ~ 189
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김현권 / 1998 / 소쉬르와역사언어학전통(1) - 통)시)론)의분석 / 언어학 19 (22) : 191 ~ 215
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002644031