지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean and Mongolian have a prespecified prefix reduplication. It applies to adjectives, especially adjectives of quality and colour, and intensifies their meaning. In Korean it copies a stem and adds one of the fixed syllable /-ti/ or /-na/ as the final syllable of the prefix. Mongolian copies the first consonant and vowel sequence of a stem and inserts the fixed consonant /v/into the coda position.
Though they are similar in their form and function, we can observe several differences between the two. First, Mongolian reduplication seems to apply more widely and productively than Korean. While both languages allow adjectives of quality and colour, only Mongolian allows adjectives of psychology and similarity. Mongolian reduplication also allows obvious loan words, which is not possible in Korean. Second, it only applies to adjectives in Korean, while it applies to adjectives and some adverbs as well in Mongolian.
?;?;We also observed a morpho-semantic constraint on the reduplication in the two languages: reduplication of intensifying lexical meaning does not apply to derivatives with weakened lexical meaning. We claim that similar constraints may be found in reduplications of other Altaic languages, if not cross-linguistically.
Though they are similar in their form and function, we can observe several differences between the two. First, Mongolian reduplication seems to apply more widely and productively than Korean. While both languages allow adjectives of quality and colour, only Mongolian allows adjectives of psychology and similarity. Mongolian reduplication also allows obvious loan words, which is not possible in Korean. Second, it only applies to adjectives in Korean, while it applies to adjectives and some adverbs as well in Mongolian.
?;?;We also observed a morpho-semantic constraint on the reduplication in the two languages: reduplication of intensifying lexical meaning does not apply to derivatives with weakened lexical meaning. We claim that similar constraints may be found in reduplications of other Altaic languages, if not cross-linguistically.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 한국어의 형용사 어두중첩
3. 몽골어의 형용사 어두중첩
4. 한국어와 몽골어 형용사 어두중첩의 차이점
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002733222