지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Relation, as one of Aristotelian categories, is different from substance. "Father" is not an expression referring to a thing(a substance), but it is a relational term, derived from a state-of-affairs "A begets B (or, A gives birth to B)", from which we call A B"s father. It takes two to have a relation, and the relation is defined or stipulated on the two. In this respect, relation is different from the other Aristotelian categories in that it takes 2 substances or two properties or others to form a relation.
For the sake of conceptual clarity, we need a terminological refinement, or redefinition. For example: A is the modifier(modificans) of B and B is the modified(modificatum) of A when A modifies(modificare) B. A is the predicator(praedicans) of B, and B is the predicated(praedicatum) of A when A predicates(praedicare) B. A is the sign(significans) of B and B is the meaning(significatum) of A when A means (signifies, significare) B. The ‘subject-predicate’ opposition is to be rendered as ‘praedicatum-praedicans’ opposition, which will make it clear what matters with respect to the relation and where the terms came from.
In relation to linguistic signs there are various relations involved: 1) the sign-meaning relation; 2) the sign-sign relation; 3) the meaning-meaning relation; 4) the sign-(meaning-meaning) relation; 5) the (sign-sign)-(meaning-meaning) relation. The syntactic relations as spoken by Chomskians are usually intended to be that of 2), the sign-sign relation, but we can see many times they involve 3), the meaning-meaning relation.
There are three meaning-meaning relations: modification(A modifies B), predication(A predicates B), and conjunction(A and B are conjoined with each other). These are the core relations which describe the structure of the meanings of language. And if we can say language constructs the world as it is, the 3 are the central ways of how it constructs the world. By predication a state of affairs comes to have its shape; by modification a thing comes to have its shape. Without such languaging the state of affairs has no structure, no shape, so it cannot exist as such. The languaging(modifying, predicating, conjoining) is the principle of structuring the world.
It takes two to tango. It takes two to relate. The study of relation is the study of two-ness.
For the sake of conceptual clarity, we need a terminological refinement, or redefinition. For example: A is the modifier(modificans) of B and B is the modified(modificatum) of A when A modifies(modificare) B. A is the predicator(praedicans) of B, and B is the predicated(praedicatum) of A when A predicates(praedicare) B. A is the sign(significans) of B and B is the meaning(significatum) of A when A means (signifies, significare) B. The ‘subject-predicate’ opposition is to be rendered as ‘praedicatum-praedicans’ opposition, which will make it clear what matters with respect to the relation and where the terms came from.
In relation to linguistic signs there are various relations involved: 1) the sign-meaning relation; 2) the sign-sign relation; 3) the meaning-meaning relation; 4) the sign-(meaning-meaning) relation; 5) the (sign-sign)-(meaning-meaning) relation. The syntactic relations as spoken by Chomskians are usually intended to be that of 2), the sign-sign relation, but we can see many times they involve 3), the meaning-meaning relation.
There are three meaning-meaning relations: modification(A modifies B), predication(A predicates B), and conjunction(A and B are conjoined with each other). These are the core relations which describe the structure of the meanings of language. And if we can say language constructs the world as it is, the 3 are the central ways of how it constructs the world. By predication a state of affairs comes to have its shape; by modification a thing comes to have its shape. Without such languaging the state of affairs has no structure, no shape, so it cannot exist as such. The languaging(modifying, predicating, conjoining) is the principle of structuring the world.
It takes two to tango. It takes two to relate. The study of relation is the study of two-ness.
#relation
#category
#substance
#substantivism
#qualitativism
#meaning
#sign
#syntactic
#semantic
#predicate
#subject
#argument
#conjunction
#predication
#modification
#praedicans
#praedicatum
#significans
#significatum
#modificans
#modificatum
#coniunctum
#core relations
#two-ness
#constructivism
#intuition
#languaging
#structure
#form
#sign-sign relation
#meaning-meaning relation
#sign-(meaning-meaning) relation
#(sign-sign)-(meaning-meaning) relation
목차
1. 관계란 무엇인가?
2. 관계는 어떤 모습을 갖는가?
3. 관계에 관련된 용어
4. 관계는 어떻게 설정되는가?
5. 관계들에는 어떤 것들이 있는가?
6. 언어 기호를 둘러싼 관계들
7. 형식과 구조와 관계
8. 주어란 문장의 주어인가, 술어의 주어인가?
9. 논항(argument)과 주어(subject)
10. 실체주의와 성질주의
11. 언어가 세계를 구성한다
12. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 1996 / ‘이다’의 범주 / 언어학 18
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2001 / 언어학의 몇 가지 도그마들 / 어문연구 37 : 83 ~ 113
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2007 / -나, -도, -만 / 언어학 (47) : 139 ~ 157
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2008 / 무엇을 명사라고 하는가 / 언어학 (50) : 169 ~ 199
5. [단행본] - Aristotle / 1984 / The Complete Works of Aristotle. vol 1 / Princeton University Press
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2001 / 언어학의 몇 가지 도그마들 / 어문연구 37 : 83 ~ 113
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2007 / -나, -도, -만 / 언어학 (47) : 139 ~ 157
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2008 / 무엇을 명사라고 하는가 / 언어학 (50) : 169 ~ 199
5. [단행본] - Aristotle / 1984 / The Complete Works of Aristotle. vol 1 / Princeton University Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002732583