지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After the 2000’s, the most remarkable phenomenon is the increase of representable interest in the figures of the others. In many Korean novels which represent the others, the cognition and sense of ‘political correctness’ are their fundamental literary task. But the important thing is the question like this. Is the portion of literature the ideological practice of ‘political correctness’ in this time. ‘Political correctness’ is hostile to literature itself and politics of literature. Literature which can translate into political and cultural discourses smoothly, and which do not have it’s own portion, is the repetition of literature in the 1980’s already died. What literature in the 1980’s taught is, when literature do not invent it’s own portion different from politics, it can’t political fully. Therefore when multi-culturalism constitute a problem, and when someone ask literature for carrying the value of multi-culturalism, literature must tell like this: ‘No, Thanks!’ In this time of transnational muliculture in which all fixed borders is crumbling down, new possibility of literature after the end must begin from that refusal. In fact, experience of the encounter with the others is like as trauma. That shake violently subjective sense, cognition, and sensation, and throw it into confusion. And that is the experience of impossibility which can’t integrate with subject’s existing cognition and perception. That point of impossibility is the place which literature must make a political and literal issue.
목차
1. 출몰하는 타자들
2. 경계의 해체 혹은 타자들
3. 다문화주의? No, Thanks!
4. 세 개의 사례, 혹은 불가능성
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0