지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국데이터전략학회 Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management Special Section
- 발행연도
- 2013.9
- 수록면
- 201 - 217 (17page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes the effect of network neutrality regulation on social welfare using the two-sided market under the network congestion. This paper deals with zero price rule regulation which means the price regulation on the side of content. The results are as follows :
First, under the monopoly platform, internet use price, contents price, and the number of internet user and content provider are all decreasing as the network congestion increases.
Second, under the monopoly platform internet use price, contents price, and the number of internet user and content provider are all increasing as the network capacity increases.
Third, the price of internet use and contents internet use which maximize social welfare are increasing and the number of internet user and content provider are decreasing as the network congestion increases.
Fourth, optimal network capacity for monopoly platform provider is less than socially optimal network capacity.
Fifth, if network neutrality regulation is enforced, the price of internet use is higher than monopoly platform provider and the price of contents is lower than monopoly platform provider. Also, the number of internet user is less than monopoly platform provider and the number of content provider is more than that. By the way, when network congestion increases, internet use price, the number of internet user, and the number of content provider are decreasing.
Sixth, network neutrality regulation is more effective for internet user side than contents provider when network congestion is considered. This means that network neutrality regulation is not effective for contents market side when network congestion is seriously large.
First, under the monopoly platform, internet use price, contents price, and the number of internet user and content provider are all decreasing as the network congestion increases.
Second, under the monopoly platform internet use price, contents price, and the number of internet user and content provider are all increasing as the network capacity increases.
Third, the price of internet use and contents internet use which maximize social welfare are increasing and the number of internet user and content provider are decreasing as the network congestion increases.
Fourth, optimal network capacity for monopoly platform provider is less than socially optimal network capacity.
Fifth, if network neutrality regulation is enforced, the price of internet use is higher than monopoly platform provider and the price of contents is lower than monopoly platform provider. Also, the number of internet user is less than monopoly platform provider and the number of content provider is more than that. By the way, when network congestion increases, internet use price, the number of internet user, and the number of content provider are decreasing.
Sixth, network neutrality regulation is more effective for internet user side than contents provider when network congestion is considered. This means that network neutrality regulation is not effective for contents market side when network congestion is seriously large.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 기존문헌 분석
3. 연구모형
4. 모형의 분석
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Armstrong, M. / 2006 / Competition in Two Sided Markets / RAND, Journal of Economics 37 (3) : 668 ~ 691
2. [단행본] - Carter, K. R. / 2008 / Network Neutrality : Implications for Europe / Wik Consult
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cheng, H. K. / 2011 / The debate on net neutrality : A policy perspective / Information Systems Research 22 : 60 ~ 82
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi, J. P / 2010 / Net Neutrality and Investment Incentives / RAND Journal of Economics 41 : 446 ~ 471
5. [인터넷자원] - Economides, N. / / The Economics of Network Neutrality
2. [단행본] - Carter, K. R. / 2008 / Network Neutrality : Implications for Europe / Wik Consult
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cheng, H. K. / 2011 / The debate on net neutrality : A policy perspective / Information Systems Research 22 : 60 ~ 82
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi, J. P / 2010 / Net Neutrality and Investment Incentives / RAND Journal of Economics 41 : 446 ~ 471
5. [인터넷자원] - Economides, N. / / The Economics of Network Neutrality
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
네덜란드의 망중립성
Nico van Eijk
,
김성환
경제규제와 법
2014
.05
프랑스의 망중립성: 개관
Be
,
t
,
and du Ma
외 2명
경제규제와 법
2014
.05
영국에서의 망중립성 규제 : 투명성 및 가입자의 망사업자 전환 용이성의 강화
Ch
,
is Ma
,
sden
외 1명
경제규제와 법
2014
.05
ICT 생태계의 건강성 제고를 위한 망중립성 정책 방향 : 스마트TV를 중심으로
신민수
한국통신학회지(정보와통신)
2012
.09
스마트미디어 경쟁 관점에서 본 망중립성 대응에 대한 연구 : 양면시장 이론을 근간으로
송민정
한국언론학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2012
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-000-002840156