메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jiseon Park (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2013.8
수록면
99 - 125 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study uses the method of conversation analysis and explicates the ways in which the two alternative forms of negative yes/no question-declarative and interrogative-are used to implement the social action of challenge in naturally occurring conversation. The analysis shows that a negative declarative question can frame a challenge against what was conveyed in the preceding talk for its appropriateness or correctness. In this case, the negative declarative question addresses an epistemic conflict against general and/or cultural knowledge of how the world operates. This study also examines the challenging action implemented through a negative interrogative question. The analysis demonstrates that the strong assertiveness delivered through a negative interrogative is similar to that of a negative declarative but that the negation portion of the negative interrogative does not actually negate the propositional content of the question as the negative declarative question does. Instead, the negation of a negative interrogative is related to projecting a strong assertiveness of the speaker to the matter addressed through the question. Based on the findings of the analysis, the paper suggests that speakers treat the two question formats as different interactional objects that have different epistemic and interactional consequences.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Background
3. The Data
4. Analysis
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0