지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper’s focus is on the「テアル」construction known for its highly frequent misuse and great pedagogical difficulties in consideration of the viewpoint that relevant textbooks also contribute to the occurrence of the misuse. This paper therefore covers the analysis of 14 Japanese grammar books that are available on the market and takes into account whether the textbooks describe the「テアル」sentence structure correctly, and whether they present appropriate examples for each type of usage.
Whether explanations related to the usage of the「テアル」construction have been centered on ‘results of artificial acts’ can be identified while any account related to that of ‘results of unintentional acts and an objective description of what is right there before one’s eyes’ has rarely been found. In response to the question as to whether those textbooks present correct examples of each usage, findings show that there are a lot of issues on that subject as well. Particularly, a fair number of examples of the ‘objective description of what is right there before one’s eyes’ are found to have been presented incorrectly as examples of ‘results of artificial acts’.
Further to those problems, there is the problem of representing passive and active voices. Although the「テアル」construction is divided into the active and passive voices in the context of syntactic constructions, and each semantic usage is different, the results of the textbook analysis actually show that most textbooks neither distinguish both sentence structures nor even mention the difference in usage. Moreover, 13 out of 14 textbooks subject to this examination give erroneous descriptions, saying that ‘intransitive verbs cannot be used as the predicate of the「テアル」construction’. With respect to the active voice, it is even possible to use intransitive verbs as the predicate of the「テアル」construction if there is any volition; therefore, the account that all intransitive verbs cannot be used as the predicate of the「テアル」syntax is definitely an erroneous conclusion.
Lastly, it is confirmed that those textbooks tend to repeatedly use most of examples of the「テアル」 syntax only for some specific verbs. Thus, in order to prevent any misuse and to enhance a correct understanding of the「テアル」construction, it is urgently necessary to rectify the issues entrenched in the aforementioned textbooks.
Whether explanations related to the usage of the「テアル」construction have been centered on ‘results of artificial acts’ can be identified while any account related to that of ‘results of unintentional acts and an objective description of what is right there before one’s eyes’ has rarely been found. In response to the question as to whether those textbooks present correct examples of each usage, findings show that there are a lot of issues on that subject as well. Particularly, a fair number of examples of the ‘objective description of what is right there before one’s eyes’ are found to have been presented incorrectly as examples of ‘results of artificial acts’.
Further to those problems, there is the problem of representing passive and active voices. Although the「テアル」construction is divided into the active and passive voices in the context of syntactic constructions, and each semantic usage is different, the results of the textbook analysis actually show that most textbooks neither distinguish both sentence structures nor even mention the difference in usage. Moreover, 13 out of 14 textbooks subject to this examination give erroneous descriptions, saying that ‘intransitive verbs cannot be used as the predicate of the「テアル」construction’. With respect to the active voice, it is even possible to use intransitive verbs as the predicate of the「テアル」construction if there is any volition; therefore, the account that all intransitive verbs cannot be used as the predicate of the「テアル」syntax is definitely an erroneous conclusion.
Lastly, it is confirmed that those textbooks tend to repeatedly use most of examples of the「テアル」 syntax only for some specific verbs. Thus, in order to prevent any misuse and to enhance a correct understanding of the「テアル」construction, it is urgently necessary to rectify the issues entrenched in the aforementioned textbooks.
목차
〈Abstract〉
1. はじめに
2. 先行?究の?討及び問題の提起
3. ?材分析
4. まとめ及び今後の課題
?考文?
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 安藤節子 / 2012 / コーパスに見るテアル表現の意味用法と共起動詞 : 日本語教育/学習の観点から / 桜美林言語教育論叢 (8)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李京保 / 2004 / シテアル形に関する一考察 / 東京外国語大学日本研究教育年報 8
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李光秀 / 2001 / "日本語"てある"文의 構造 / 日語日文學硏究 38
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 浦木貴和 / 2006 / "テアル"構文に関する考察 / 日本語·日本文化研究 16
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 浦木貴和 / 2010 / テ形節とスケール構造からみた"テアル"構文の意味分析 / 日本語·日本文化研究 20
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李京保 / 2004 / シテアル形に関する一考察 / 東京外国語大学日本研究教育年報 8
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李光秀 / 2001 / "日本語"てある"文의 構造 / 日語日文學硏究 38
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 浦木貴和 / 2006 / "テアル"構文に関する考察 / 日本語·日本文化研究 16
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 浦木貴和 / 2010 / テ形節とスケール構造からみた"テアル"構文の意味分析 / 日本語·日本文化研究 20
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002479067