지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.6
- 수록면
- 632 - 642 (11page)
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Legacy preferences has become the key issue of educational policy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the recognition of university students and parents about legacy preferences. The questionnaire which was made by researcher of this study was used as the method of this study. As a sampling, university students 360 and parents 312 were sampled. And SPSSWIN 20.0 was used as the method of data analysis.
As a conclusion, this study indicates as follows. First, the ratio of disagreement of legacy preferences was higher than the ratio of agreement of legacy preferences. But higher-income class parents were tended to agree with legacy preferences. Second, many university students and parents regarded‘economic advantages for tuition payments and a scholarship’, ‘excellences for education by helping financial deficit of university’ as agreement reasons of legacy preferences. And many university students and parents regarded ‘reproduction of social class’, ‘promotion of one’s sense of values of mammonism’ as disagreement reasons of legacy preferences.
As a conclusion, this study indicates as follows. First, the ratio of disagreement of legacy preferences was higher than the ratio of agreement of legacy preferences. But higher-income class parents were tended to agree with legacy preferences. Second, many university students and parents regarded‘economic advantages for tuition payments and a scholarship’, ‘excellences for education by helping financial deficit of university’ as agreement reasons of legacy preferences. And many university students and parents regarded ‘reproduction of social class’, ‘promotion of one’s sense of values of mammonism’ as disagreement reasons of legacy preferences.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 연구 결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의
Reference
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Choi, H. K. / 2005 / The constitutional study on the contribution enrollment system / Korean Journal of Educational Law 8 (2) : 201 ~ 233
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Go, S. L. / 1992 / A tentative plan of regulations for "admission-by-donation" in universities and colleges / Korean Journal of Higher Education 4 (1) : 95 ~ 102
3. [인터넷자원] - / / Herald Economic Newspaper
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 홍창남 / 2008 / 기여입학제의 교육적 정당성 / 교육행정학연구 26 (3) : 25 ~ 48
5. [학위논문] - Jang, Y. H. / 2006 / A study on validity of contribution preferences / Master / Seoul National University
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Go, S. L. / 1992 / A tentative plan of regulations for "admission-by-donation" in universities and colleges / Korean Journal of Higher Education 4 (1) : 95 ~ 102
3. [인터넷자원] - / / Herald Economic Newspaper
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 홍창남 / 2008 / 기여입학제의 교육적 정당성 / 교육행정학연구 26 (3) : 25 ~ 48
5. [학위논문] - Jang, Y. H. / 2006 / A study on validity of contribution preferences / Master / Seoul National University
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-520-003216313