지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the test-retest reliability of paper-pencil test for investigating population stereotype of burner-control linkages of four-stove gas ranges. Background: Much of the research on gas-range stereotype strength has been performed using the paper-pencil test. While the use of the paper-pencil tests has the advantage of collecting data in a large group of subjects against reasonable costs, concerns regarding the reliability of the paper-pencil test has also been stated. Method: Three paper-pencil tests classified by intervals of test-retest were performed, in which eight types of burner-control arrangements were investigated. Sixty eight subjects were test-retested within two weeks, 85 subjects were test-retested within four weeks and 58 subjects were test-retested three times in series with interval of two and four weeks. Results: Chi-square test showed that three intervals of test-retest including two, four and two & four weeks have not statistically significant effect on subjects" responses irrespective of eight types of burner-control linkages dealt with in this study(p>0.10). Concordance rates of subjects" responses ranged between 73.5% and 100.0% for two-week test-retest, between 67.1% and 97.6% for four-week test-retest, and between 65.5% and 100.0% for two- and four-week serial test-retest. The concordance rates were linearly correlated with proportion of subjects" responses for stereotypes of burnercontrol linkages. Conclusion: It is concluded that the paper-pencil tests for investigating gas range relevant stereotypes could reproduce reliable results compared to baseline test within interval of four weeks. Application: The results of this study would be useful as an ergonomic guideline when designing the paper-pencil tests for stereotype relevant studies.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
Chapanis, A. / 1959 / A reaction-time study of four controldisplay linkage / Human Factors 1:1~7
Coluci. M.Z.O. / 2009 / Reliability and validity of an ergonomics-related Job Factors Questionnaire / International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39:995~1001
d'Errico, A. / 2007 / Mediumand long-term reproducibility of self-reported exposure to physical ergonomics factors at work / Applied Ergonomics 38:167~175
Hlapern, M. / 2001 / The test-retest reliability of a new occupational risk factor questionnaire for outcome studies of low back pain / Applied Ergonomics 32:39~46
Hoffmann, E.R. / 2009 / Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength?: A review of available data / International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39:904~912
Coluci. M.Z.O. / 2009 / Reliability and validity of an ergonomics-related Job Factors Questionnaire / International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39:995~1001
d'Errico, A. / 2007 / Mediumand long-term reproducibility of self-reported exposure to physical ergonomics factors at work / Applied Ergonomics 38:167~175
Hlapern, M. / 2001 / The test-retest reliability of a new occupational risk factor questionnaire for outcome studies of low back pain / Applied Ergonomics 32:39~46
Hoffmann, E.R. / 2009 / Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength?: A review of available data / International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39:904~912
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-500-003282848