메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박영철 (군산대)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第123輯
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
121 - 150 (30page)
DOI
10.17856/jahs.2013.06.123.121

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is for a comparative historical study to elucidate the legal structure and legal thought of the Chinese during the pre-modern era focusing the Chinese lawyer named ‘songshi(litigation master)’which presented itself in the Song era world-widely considered as the Chinese renaissance period in the circle of sinology. Being a parasitic status in the Chinese bureaucratic system, songshi could not be an elite class like the Western lawyers. In collusion with the petty-officials(xuli) who are in the similar status with the songshis in the Chinese bureaucratic system, songshis as Chinese lawyers in the legal actions seem to have a considerable role in making the Chinese ‘litigious society’. But the Chinese ‘litigious society’cannot be equivalent to the Western litigious society as the Chinese Songshi cannot be equivalent to the Western lawyer. Being comparatively studied, Western lawyer’s guild is a glorious powerful open elite guild which has made an indispensable role in making western modern state, but the Chinese songshi’s guild is an unglorious violent secret parasitic guild which has always been chased by the government as an illegal dangerous group.
What made the Chinese lawyer as such as illegal is the Chinese despotic rulership and the Confucian moral idea of rule in which Chinese rulership rooted. In the Confucian moral rulership lega actions are in the state of contradiction. In principle they are open and everyone is free to go to act. But in reality not everybody is free to go to court, so someone is needed for one to go to court. Chinese law has kept this law for the people who are in need of someone to help one to go to court as early as Tang law. But the Confucian moral rulership historically being in the state of contradiction at last submitted to the reality of Chinese ‘litigious society’. Emperor Qianlong made the Tang law illegal in 1776. At this point it can be said more clearly that the Chinese ‘litigious society’ is not equivalent to the Western.
As is shown by the edict of Emperor Dowager, Songshi was one of three evils in the Chinese bureaucratic society. This is to show that Songshi which was to be the fine fruit of the Chinese Renaissance could not become a good profession as Western lawyers which was also the fine fruit of Western Renaissance. In this respect the Chinese Song Renaissance Studies which has it’s own long history is need to be reconsidered.

목차

1. 문제의 제기
2. 訟師의 존재 구조
3. 訟師의 訴訟방식 : 訴訟社會인가 訴?社會인가?
4. 전제지배와 訟師의 향방
5. 結語-訟師의 향방과 宋代르네상스
참고문헌

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-003301308