메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
하종문 (한신대)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2013년 여름 호(통권 103호)
발행연도
2013.5
수록면
298 - 332 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In 1943 Japan, the requisition system and ‘Labor Constitutional Law (勤?根本法, LCL)’ sparked a serious controversy over issues on the nationality (?家性) of labor (??, 勤?) and enterprise. This paper analyzes the process and meaning of their controversy.
Numerous studies on the framework and actual conditions of labor power mobilization, have failed to consider its contradiction and dynamics. The problem of labor power mobilization has not been analyzed by academics because it has been taken for granted. However, it is crucial to note that those who were originally drafted for the national cause ended up working for private enterprise. This contradictory outcome was? to coexistence of national labor and private business in the same field-a distortion of ‘system’ and ‘idea’.
In 1943, the Ministry of Welfare attempted to reform the requisition system by enacting LCL, which substituted the former Factory Act (工場法) and consisted of policies related to labor including the nationalization of labor and enterprise.
Nevertheless, the tentative plan of LCL was too radical to be accepted by the economic entities and was suspended. In spite of the enactment of the Munitions Factory Act (軍需?社法), contradictions that surrounded the nationality of labor and enterprise were not resolved. In other words, the conflict between labor and enterprise and the simultaneous exploration of the labor problem was deliberately evaded by the state power in wartime Japan.
This point is a critical to Yamanouchi Yasushi’s argument that rationalized of the total-war system. Nationalization in the mobilization policy of labor power was only something created by the state power and it is imperative that we focus on the unstable nature of Japanese policy which stemmed from the distortion of ‘system’ and ‘idea’.

목차

들어가며
1. 전시 노동력 정책과 동원의 이념
2. 노동력 동원 이념 창출의 움직임
3. 후생성의 인식과 대응
4. 근로근본법 찬반의 논점
5. 근로근본법의 무산과 그 심층
나오며
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-002558236