지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1943 Japan, the requisition system and ‘Labor Constitutional Law (勤?根本法, LCL)’ sparked a serious controversy over issues on the nationality (?家性) of labor (??, 勤?) and enterprise. This paper analyzes the process and meaning of their controversy.
Numerous studies on the framework and actual conditions of labor power mobilization, have failed to consider its contradiction and dynamics. The problem of labor power mobilization has not been analyzed by academics because it has been taken for granted. However, it is crucial to note that those who were originally drafted for the national cause ended up working for private enterprise. This contradictory outcome was? to coexistence of national labor and private business in the same field-a distortion of ‘system’ and ‘idea’.
In 1943, the Ministry of Welfare attempted to reform the requisition system by enacting LCL, which substituted the former Factory Act (工場法) and consisted of policies related to labor including the nationalization of labor and enterprise.
Nevertheless, the tentative plan of LCL was too radical to be accepted by the economic entities and was suspended. In spite of the enactment of the Munitions Factory Act (軍需?社法), contradictions that surrounded the nationality of labor and enterprise were not resolved. In other words, the conflict between labor and enterprise and the simultaneous exploration of the labor problem was deliberately evaded by the state power in wartime Japan.
This point is a critical to Yamanouchi Yasushi’s argument that rationalized of the total-war system. Nationalization in the mobilization policy of labor power was only something created by the state power and it is imperative that we focus on the unstable nature of Japanese policy which stemmed from the distortion of ‘system’ and ‘idea’.
Numerous studies on the framework and actual conditions of labor power mobilization, have failed to consider its contradiction and dynamics. The problem of labor power mobilization has not been analyzed by academics because it has been taken for granted. However, it is crucial to note that those who were originally drafted for the national cause ended up working for private enterprise. This contradictory outcome was? to coexistence of national labor and private business in the same field-a distortion of ‘system’ and ‘idea’.
In 1943, the Ministry of Welfare attempted to reform the requisition system by enacting LCL, which substituted the former Factory Act (工場法) and consisted of policies related to labor including the nationalization of labor and enterprise.
Nevertheless, the tentative plan of LCL was too radical to be accepted by the economic entities and was suspended. In spite of the enactment of the Munitions Factory Act (軍需?社法), contradictions that surrounded the nationality of labor and enterprise were not resolved. In other words, the conflict between labor and enterprise and the simultaneous exploration of the labor problem was deliberately evaded by the state power in wartime Japan.
This point is a critical to Yamanouchi Yasushi’s argument that rationalized of the total-war system. Nationalization in the mobilization policy of labor power was only something created by the state power and it is imperative that we focus on the unstable nature of Japanese policy which stemmed from the distortion of ‘system’ and ‘idea’.
목차
들어가며
1. 전시 노동력 정책과 동원의 이념
2. 노동력 동원 이념 창출의 움직임
3. 후생성의 인식과 대응
4. 근로근본법 찬반의 논점
5. 근로근본법의 무산과 그 심층
나오며
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-002558236