메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Eun-Ju Noh (Inha University) Sungryong Koh (Seoul National University) Si On Yoon (University of Illinois)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제37권 제2호
발행연도
2012.6
수록면
325 - 343 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is a preliminary research on the interpretation process of metalinguistic negation (or MN) as opposed to descriptive negation (or DN), using an eye-tracking method. It is generally assumed that MN is marked and takes more processing effort than DN. However, there has been no experimental evidence to confirm this assumption. In this research, we
conducted two eye-tracking experiments using Korean negative sentences. Experiment 1 was designed to investigate the processing time of the clarification clause of an MN. The results confirmed that the clarification clause takes longer to process when the preceding negation is interpreted as an MN than when it is interpreted as a DN. We conclude that egation tends to be interpreted descriptively on a first pass, and when that DN interpretation turns out to be wrong, it is reanalyzed as an MN on a second pass. Experiment 2 was designed to examine the processing time of an MN when the clarification clause is provided before the negative clause. The results showed that MN takes more processing time than DN, even when the clarification clause is given in advance. The results of these two experiments confirmed the markedness of MN.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Previous Accounts of MN
3. Negative Forms in Korean
4. Experiment 1: Which Type of Negation Is Taken First
5. Experiment 2: Which Type of Negation Takes Longer
6. Summary and Conclusion

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-003143946