지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.3
- 수록면
- 107 - 130 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is to compare the two representative villains in Shakespeare, Richard in Richard III and Shylock in The Merchant of Venice, so that we could examine the characteristics of Shakespeare’s villain and further understand how the works become more meaningful though these villains’ attitudes and actions manifested in the play. Shakespeare’s characters defy one-dimensional categorization. While critics are constantly seeking a logical reduction to a single dimension of the characters, Shakespeare forces us to reconcile with the unexpected contradictions in his characters. The poet usually does not allow us to pin down the nature of his characters, and it is therefore always difficult to define a character as a stereotype. In Shakespearean drama, even an obvious stock figure often shows shades of different traits so as to reject a categorical definition. Shylock, for example, is an apparent miser figure, easily recognizable in many Renaissance plays; yet his character shows qualities that prevent us from calling him comfortably the same type of money-grubbers found in Marlowe or Jonson. Richard, a typical egocentric, Machiavellian villain whose behavior is thoroughly wicked and repulsive, nevertheless displays a certain grandeur or self-reliance, commonly found in a tragic hero, so that we create difficulty if we try to narrow down his character simply into a villain. However, the two villains significantly share a predator’s nature and similar appetite as they both struggle to devour what yearn for. And paradoxically, their final destruction provides the seeming victims with nutritions, so they are ultimately devoured by the forces stronger than themselves.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Armstrong, Edward A. / 1963 / Shakespeare’s Imagination / U of Nebraska P
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bailey, Amanda / 2011 / Shylock and the Salves: Owing and Owning in The Merchant of Venice / Shakespeare Quarterly 62 (1) : 1 ~ 24
3. [단행본] - Bevington, David / 1980 / The Complete Works of Shakespeare / Scott, Foresman and Company
4. [학위논문] - Bosworth, Denise Mary / 1981 / Fail Not Our Feast’: The Dramatic Significance of Shakespeare’s Repasts / U of Oregon
5. [단행본] - Clemen, Wolfgang / 1977 / The Development of Shakespeare’s Imagery / Methuen
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bailey, Amanda / 2011 / Shylock and the Salves: Owing and Owning in The Merchant of Venice / Shakespeare Quarterly 62 (1) : 1 ~ 24
3. [단행본] - Bevington, David / 1980 / The Complete Works of Shakespeare / Scott, Foresman and Company
4. [학위논문] - Bosworth, Denise Mary / 1981 / Fail Not Our Feast’: The Dramatic Significance of Shakespeare’s Repasts / U of Oregon
5. [단행본] - Clemen, Wolfgang / 1977 / The Development of Shakespeare’s Imagery / Methuen
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003149981