지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 3 - 153 (151page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Rate of progress and development of science and technology has already surpassed the level that humans could predict. Scientific studies to date have shown that some nanomaterials can be toxic, while others are not, and that it can be difficult to predict in advance whether any particular material will or will not be toxic, even based on tests for their microscale or macroscale counterparts. Any effect on safety will likely lead to an effect on regulatory status as well, making it prudent, if not required, to obtain Government’s approval prior to marketing the product.
Compared with developed countries, Korea is still lacking knowledge and experts on technologies and the process of securing legitimacy and consensus is neither democratic nor open. Korea now needs a major shift in its perspective and approaches when looking at technology risks, not simply from the framework of “development” but from the framework of “development and safety together.”
The increased knowledge of the central tenets of nanotechnological designs in communication processes is a research area for social scientists. Their object is to develop nanotechnology within the framework of citizen participation. The consensus achieved will support methods in policy deliberation and this is possible by means of a cognitive weighing and evaluation of facts and different perspectives to strategically plan the best objective process for citizen involvement.
Compared with developed countries, Korea is still lacking knowledge and experts on technologies and the process of securing legitimacy and consensus is neither democratic nor open. Korea now needs a major shift in its perspective and approaches when looking at technology risks, not simply from the framework of “development” but from the framework of “development and safety together.”
The increased knowledge of the central tenets of nanotechnological designs in communication processes is a research area for social scientists. Their object is to develop nanotechnology within the framework of citizen participation. The consensus achieved will support methods in policy deliberation and this is possible by means of a cognitive weighing and evaluation of facts and different perspectives to strategically plan the best objective process for citizen involvement.
목차
[표지]
[발간사]
[목차]
표 차례
그림 차례
[국문요약]
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 목적과 필요성
2. 연구내용
[제2장 나노기술의 개념과 위험성]
제1절 나노기술의 개념
제2절 나노기술의 산업화 동향 및 사회경제적 효과
제3절 나노기술의 위험성
제4절 나노기술의 EHS
[제3장 주요 선진국의 나노기술의 위험관리]
제1절 미국
제2절 EU
제3절 일본
[제4장 우리나라 나노기술관련 정책 현황]
제1절 나노기술 발전 현황
제2절 나노기술에 대한 대응과 관리
[제5장 나노기술의 위험에 관한 규범적 대응]
제1절 규범적 관점에서의 나노기술위험
제2절 나노기술위험 관리체계의 절차와 거버넌스
제3절 나노기술위험에 관한 형사법적 개입
[제6장 결론]
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-364-000223881