지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: This study aimed to make preliminary data through the bibliometric analysis of journals registered by national research foundations of Korea for the improvement of traditional Korean medical (TKM) journals.
Methods: We collected 4,396 articles from the OASIS database, which is composed of articles published by TKMsocieties and institutes. First, we analyzed the ‘authors by year’, ‘average authors per article’, ‘articles by institute’ and ‘authors by institute’ to get the author-related conditions. Second, we analyzed the ‘reference type’, ‘cited times’, ‘IF with self citation’ and ‘IF without self citation’ to get the citation condition.
Results: First, we found that the journal order of total authors was KAOOMP (2362), KOMS (1189), and KAMS (967), and of average authors per article was KAMS (5.29), KOIMS (5.25), and KOMS (4.75). Second, we learned that the journal order of occupied article ratio by high rank institutes was SCMS (92.4%), MAS (90.03%), and KOPS (87.22%) and of occupied author ratio by high rank institutes was KOPMS (96.55%), MAS (95.19%), and SCMS (93.85%). Third, we analyzed the most highly cited reference type by journals and we found that OMCS was books, SCMS was oriental medical journals and the other 10 journals were not oriental medical journals. Finally, we observed that the journal order of self citation ratio was SCMS (16.79%), KMAS (11.77%), and OOGS (11.67%) and also that the IF order was KAMS (0.675), OOGS (0.546), and KAOH (0.430).
Conclusions: Through this study we found that TKM research leans too much toward on oriental medical universities, so we insist that TKM R&D institutes must be expanded. We also found that the self citation ratio was high in TKM journals, so the ratio must be decreased to improve the quality of the TKM journals.
Methods: We collected 4,396 articles from the OASIS database, which is composed of articles published by TKMsocieties and institutes. First, we analyzed the ‘authors by year’, ‘average authors per article’, ‘articles by institute’ and ‘authors by institute’ to get the author-related conditions. Second, we analyzed the ‘reference type’, ‘cited times’, ‘IF with self citation’ and ‘IF without self citation’ to get the citation condition.
Results: First, we found that the journal order of total authors was KAOOMP (2362), KOMS (1189), and KAMS (967), and of average authors per article was KAMS (5.29), KOIMS (5.25), and KOMS (4.75). Second, we learned that the journal order of occupied article ratio by high rank institutes was SCMS (92.4%), MAS (90.03%), and KOPS (87.22%) and of occupied author ratio by high rank institutes was KOPMS (96.55%), MAS (95.19%), and SCMS (93.85%). Third, we analyzed the most highly cited reference type by journals and we found that OMCS was books, SCMS was oriental medical journals and the other 10 journals were not oriental medical journals. Finally, we observed that the journal order of self citation ratio was SCMS (16.79%), KMAS (11.77%), and OOGS (11.67%) and also that the IF order was KAMS (0.675), OOGS (0.546), and KAOH (0.430).
Conclusions: Through this study we found that TKM research leans too much toward on oriental medical universities, so we insist that TKM R&D institutes must be expanded. We also found that the self citation ratio was high in TKM journals, so the ratio must be decreased to improve the quality of the TKM journals.
목차
서론
연구 방법
분석 결과
고찰
결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
1. [인터넷자원] - / / Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System
2. [인터넷자원] - / / Bibliometics-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3. [인터넷자원] - / / National Research Foundation of Korea
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Kwon YK / 1999 / Fundamental Study for Bibliometic Analysis of Oriental Medical Literature / Journal of Korean Oriental Medical Society 20 (1) : 30 ~ 43
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Seo YM / 2004 / Analysis of Articles Published in The Journal of Korean Oriental Pediatrics / Journal of Korean Oriental Pediatrics 18 (1) : 247 ~ 272
2. [인터넷자원] - / / Bibliometics-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3. [인터넷자원] - / / National Research Foundation of Korea
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Kwon YK / 1999 / Fundamental Study for Bibliometic Analysis of Oriental Medical Literature / Journal of Korean Oriental Medical Society 20 (1) : 30 ~ 43
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Seo YM / 2004 / Analysis of Articles Published in The Journal of Korean Oriental Pediatrics / Journal of Korean Oriental Pediatrics 18 (1) : 247 ~ 272
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-519-000262312