지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.2
- 수록면
- 139 - 159 (21page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper tests Catherine Gallagher’s claim that political economy and the Victorian novel shared a common conceptualization of the body economic by reading Mill’s The Subjection of Women and Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend as a dialogue on the issue of an ideal marriage and women’s education. We find that the concern for collaboration in marriage proposed by Mill reflects a more general concern that classes should keep to their own, that education should help and not hinder the separation between classed outside the family and that it should serve to weld classes together within the home. Similarly, the concern about the marriage of contrasts we find in Dickens reflects a more general unease over inter-class marriage. This common ideological hostility to the mixing of classes should not blind us to the nuances between them; on the contrary, by underlining their common ideology and their shared social context, we become far more sensitized to the stylistic differences and textual distinctions. The contiguity between the texts, however, is then attributable to a shared social discourse which the texts instantiate. It is this shared social context that enables us to read the two texts in the fashion of a dialogue, testing out their ideas of marriage of contrast, sweet collaboration. After all, if as one scholar suggested, it is possible to read Mill’s work as a prelude to an unwritten novel about domestic bliss, it is surely possible to read a novel by Dickens the other way, as a prelude to a non-fiction work directly concerned with the subjugation of women. When we do this, we may find that there is indeed a very substantial common ground between the men of political economy and the men of letters, but it has more to do with their shared maleness than their antagonistic disciplines, and it is not so much a break with the 18th Century as a link in a chain that leads right down to our own time.
목차
Introduction: Political Economists ,Literati, and Cats of All Colors
Education, Mobility, and Stability
John Stuart Mill’s School of Mental Communion
Dickens’s School of Sweet Surrender
Conclusion: Real Divisions, and Real Continuity
Works Cited
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-840-000289202