지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 129 - 167 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.35505/sjlb.2012.12.2.2.129
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Motivated by the recently raised question of public enterprise debt, the 18th presidential selection and the starting of next government after six months etc. I study about what is the tasks of next government about Public Enterprises law system.
The ideological fundation of Public Enterprises is the principle of social-wlfare state and Public Enterprises is the method of regulation and coordination of the economy to realize the social-wlfare state ideology as the aim of state and at same tione that have the limit of free market economy order.
From this pointview, I research the Public Enterprises policy and legal system of every republic and government. I reach the conclusion that next government should improve various law and regulation of Public Enterprises, and establish efficiency and found the basic principle of Privatization.
First, I suggest the 「Framework Act of Public Enterprises」 and that law include the article about the Public interest to realize the principle of social-welfare state. and unify various law system to enforce effectively Public Enterprises law.
For establishing efficiency of Public Enterprises, I propose to found the national administration agency to generalize all Public Enterprises and enforce consistent policy through all republics and governments, a research institution, and promotion agency should be found. And I insist that the harmony monitoring control devices for the National Assembly and the Executive which have substantial ownership and nation participation system are necessary.
Finally, a standard of judgment of the privatization of public enterprises depends on whether or not the natural monopoly become extinct. So the government needs to institutionalize a tool which can test balance between risk of market economy order and public interest.
The ideological fundation of Public Enterprises is the principle of social-wlfare state and Public Enterprises is the method of regulation and coordination of the economy to realize the social-wlfare state ideology as the aim of state and at same tione that have the limit of free market economy order.
From this pointview, I research the Public Enterprises policy and legal system of every republic and government. I reach the conclusion that next government should improve various law and regulation of Public Enterprises, and establish efficiency and found the basic principle of Privatization.
First, I suggest the 「Framework Act of Public Enterprises」 and that law include the article about the Public interest to realize the principle of social-welfare state. and unify various law system to enforce effectively Public Enterprises law.
For establishing efficiency of Public Enterprises, I propose to found the national administration agency to generalize all Public Enterprises and enforce consistent policy through all republics and governments, a research institution, and promotion agency should be found. And I insist that the harmony monitoring control devices for the National Assembly and the Executive which have substantial ownership and nation participation system are necessary.
Finally, a standard of judgment of the privatization of public enterprises depends on whether or not the natural monopoly become extinct. So the government needs to institutionalize a tool which can test balance between risk of market economy order and public interest.
목차
Ⅰ. 공기업법제의 개관
Ⅱ. 공기업의 이념적 근거와 존재의의
Ⅲ. 공기업정책과 법제의 변화
Ⅵ. 차기정부의 법적 과제
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (3)
-
헌법재판소 1996. 4. 25. 선고 92헌바47 전원재판부
가. 심판(審判)의 대상이 되는 법규(法規)는 심판(審判) 당시 유효한 것이어야 함이 원칙이지만 위헌제청신청기각결정(違憲提請申請棄却決定)에 따른 헌법소원심판(憲法訴願審判)은 실질상 헌법소원심판(憲法訴願審判)이라기보다는 위헌법률심판(違憲法律審判)이라 할 것이므로 폐지(廢止)된 법률(法律)이라고 할지라도 그 위헌(違憲) 여부(與否)가 재판
자세히 보기 -
헌법재판소 2002. 12. 18. 선고 2002헌마52 전원재판부
가.행정권력의 불행사에 대한 헌법소원은 공권력의 주체에게 헌법에서 유래하는 작위의무가 특별히 구체적으로 규정되어 있어 이에 따라 기본권의 주체가 행정행위를 청구할 수 있음에도 공권력의 주체가 그 의무를 해태하는 경우에 비로소 허용된다.
자세히 보기 -
헌법재판소 2009. 6. 25. 선고 2007헌바39 전원재판부
가. 건축주가 임의로 계약을 체결한 감리자에게 감리대가를 지급하는 방식으로는 감리자가 사업주체로부터 독립하여 실질적으로 감리를 행하기 어렵고, 이는 부실공사로 이어질 우려가 있으며, 부실공사는 건축물 붕괴사고, 하자분쟁, 유지보수비의 급증, 건축물 수명단축에 의한 재건축 등 그 후유증이 심각하기 때문에 주택건설사업계획 승인대상인 주택의
자세히 보기
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-360-000364016