메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
곽노열 (한남대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第29卷 第1號
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
263 - 270 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Energy performance assessment indices provide a means of rating buildings on how energy saving they are in relation to the amount of energy needed to provide building users with expected degrees of comfort and functionality. This study aims at analyzing the state of the art of office buildings’ energy saving level for BEMS in detail through result of assessment indices for energy saving performance presented in previous study in the view of buildings and applied control technologies. And in order to evaluate energy saving performance more clearly in assessment indices, level indices which linked up the level of adoption and the level of technology was defined newly and suggested. For the energy saving level, the result is summarized as follows; applied ratios of operational plans and control environment are 92%, 75%, respectively, which represent the highest level value, and air conditioners and primary pump is 73% and refrigerator, lighting, supply and exhaust fans, boiler is in the range of 59% to 52%. And, non-applied ratio of lighting, chillers, the boiler, supply and exhaust fans is in the range of 38% to 33%, and so active consideration of their technologies into buildings is necessary. And energy saving level is in the range of 89.0 to 49.5 by building and the level of adoption is in the range of 91.3 to 47.9 and the level of technology is in the range of 98.3 to 74.9 and the values are different by building. Through this result, energy saving level of actual buildings could be identified and it can be utilized to provide an alternative to improve energy saving level in the future.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 에너지절감수준 평가지표 및 수준지표
3. 실제건물 에너지절감수준 평가지표 결과상세
4. 수준지표 평가결과
5. 평가지표 및 수준지표 결과분석
6. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-540-000440211