메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한지형 (아주대학교) 김용현 (아주대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第29卷 第1號
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
197 - 207 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study explores the significance of sustainability, cited as the main aim of assessment and evaluation tools, by comparing indicators and characteristics of the four international assessment tool(LEED ND, BREEAM for Communities, CASBEE UD, HQE Amenagement) based on the 20 themes of Eco-quartier, which represents the concept of Frances’s sustainable residential neighborhoods and reflects their comprehensive characteristics. The four main categories of Eco-quartier are phase and process, lifestyle, territory development, preservation of resources and response to climate change. Twenty comprehensive themes have been suggested under these categories, and serve as a basis in analyzing the sustainability of a project in terms of environment, economy, and society. Through evaluating the indicators of assessment tools and plans for sustainable neighborhoods, we will characterize the disposition of each assessment tool by investigating the area of emphasis among environmental, social, and economical aspects, as well as the extent of bias.
From a cross-tabulation analysis of sustainability assessment standards of the four international assessment tools, it was found that LEED ND gives equal consideration to sustainability requirements and devises plans according to land characteristics. However, it lacks a clear standard for “phase and progress,” and its scoring system may lead to a biased evaluation. BREEAM for Communities offers a more detailed break down of evaluation standards, and delivers customized results by applying a regional weighted value for each standard. This method achieves a good balance in the consideration of sustainability requirements. Meanwhile, CASBEE UD is more focused on environmental aspects, and usually utilized as a method of post-evaluation. It is particularly weak in “phase and progress,” and assigns a low priority to “land development.” HQE Amenagement is more useful in the qualitative assessment of progress than the evaluation of results since all other areas are given low priority.
By conducting a comparative analysis of international assessment tools for neighborhoods to derive sustainability characteristics and principles behind specific indicators, we suggest implications for the development of a sustainability assessment tool for residential neighborhoods in the Korean context.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 에코 카르티에(Eco-quartier)의 개념과 조건
3. 에코 카르티에(Eco-quartier)의 테마를 통해 본 국제인증 평가도구
4. 4개 국제 인증 평가도구의 평가 특성 비교
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-540-000440140