지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Traditionally, Confucianism made the interest in human beings as its subject. Chinese missionaries who recognized it decided the cultural adaptationistic missionary policy to replenish Confucianism with religiousity. This was a fairly effective method, but, also has become a cause for confusion in understanding the academic world of Yakyong Jeong(Dasan, 茶山 丁若鏞) today. This study examined how much relation the concepts of Heaven and God of Yakyong Jeong had with the Western Studies of Jesuit Accommodation with focus on that.
First, the concept of Heaven of Yakyong Jeong can be viewed to have succeeded to the concepts of Heaven of Nature and Heaven of Morality of Confucianist tradition. Confucianism could get the spotlight as humanics in the modern times because it was magnified that the concept of Heaven of primitive religion was only demanded as a moral ground in Confucius and Mencius. Therefore, it should be viewed that the keynote of thoughts of Yakyong Jeong is modernistic and antropocentric because it still remains not in the Western Studies of Jesuit Accommodation based on medieval Christianity but in the Confucianist tradition.
Next, the concept of God of Yakyong Jeong can be viewed to be highly related to Western Studies in that it used the expression of ‘God’, which was recognized as a religious terminology in the tradition of East Asia. This is also identified in the fact that missionaries first used the expressions of Heaven and God together and later used only the terminology of Heaven and Lord of Heaven. However, the God of Yakyong Jeong had the style of existence settled in the moral mind of human beings as Providence, and it should be viewed not to have got out of Confucianist tradition in fact.
Yakyong Jeong denied the relation with Western Studies during his lifetime. Of course, this action might be an inevitable choice because of political situation at that time. However, it is judged that he did not get out of the Confucianist tradition even in the concept of God, which is evaluated to be the most highly related to Western Studies. Therefore, this point is needed to be reinterpreted not in the existing viewpoint of Apologetics but in the philosophical viewpoint.
First, the concept of Heaven of Yakyong Jeong can be viewed to have succeeded to the concepts of Heaven of Nature and Heaven of Morality of Confucianist tradition. Confucianism could get the spotlight as humanics in the modern times because it was magnified that the concept of Heaven of primitive religion was only demanded as a moral ground in Confucius and Mencius. Therefore, it should be viewed that the keynote of thoughts of Yakyong Jeong is modernistic and antropocentric because it still remains not in the Western Studies of Jesuit Accommodation based on medieval Christianity but in the Confucianist tradition.
Next, the concept of God of Yakyong Jeong can be viewed to be highly related to Western Studies in that it used the expression of ‘God’, which was recognized as a religious terminology in the tradition of East Asia. This is also identified in the fact that missionaries first used the expressions of Heaven and God together and later used only the terminology of Heaven and Lord of Heaven. However, the God of Yakyong Jeong had the style of existence settled in the moral mind of human beings as Providence, and it should be viewed not to have got out of Confucianist tradition in fact.
Yakyong Jeong denied the relation with Western Studies during his lifetime. Of course, this action might be an inevitable choice because of political situation at that time. However, it is judged that he did not get out of the Confucianist tradition even in the concept of God, which is evaluated to be the most highly related to Western Studies. Therefore, this point is needed to be reinterpreted not in the existing viewpoint of Apologetics but in the philosophical viewpoint.
#茶山 丁若鏞
#西學
#문화적응주의적 선교
#天觀 인간중심주의
#昭事上帝
#事天
#修己
#朝鮮實學
#Yakyong Jeong(Dasan
#茶山 丁若鏞)
#Western Studies(西學)
#The cultural adaptationistic missionary policy
#View of God
#antropocentrism
#Zhāoshishàngdhi(昭事上帝
#Serving Shàngdhi Brightly)
#shitian(事天
#Serving Heaven)
#self-cultivation(修己)
#The Realist School of Confucianism of Joseon(朝鮮實學)
목차
1. 서론
2. 茶山의 天 관념과 補儒論的 西學의 天 관념
3. 茶山의 昭事上帝 관념과 補儒論的 西學의 上帝 관념
4. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-236-000466009