메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정복 (대구대학교)
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 語文學 第118輯
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
93 - 117 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze the Korean honorific using by reviewers and submitters of treatises from a sociolinguistic perspective. The data for this paper is the reports of reviewers and submitters written by researchers in the screening process of papers. We described the basic usages and strategies of honorific use in section 2. Section 3 analyzed the differences of hearer honorific use between reviewer and submitter group with statistical methods. In section 4, we interpreted the cause of differences occurred in the use of honorifics. In the process of this analysis, we could observe that there were distinct differences in the use of honorifics of reviewers and submitters. The honorific score of submitters was much higher than that of reviewers. It is the result of the strategic use of honorifics by submitters. The strategy is that ‘speak more politely to the giver or favorer.’ Although the majors of reviewers and submitters are the same and the inclinations and social positions of them are similar, there were qualitative differences in the honorific use between two groups due to the different temporal role relations of them. In the paper screening process, reviewers have power on the publishing decision of submitter’s paper as superiors. But submitters have to be subordinates, so in general they speak more politely than reviewers.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 경어법 사용의 기본적 방식과 특징
3. 경어법 사용의 집단 간 차이
4. 경어법 사용 차이에 대한 해석
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-810-000594720