지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The strategy of marketplace neutrality has already been discussed by historians focusing on ancient western history and economic anthropology. Ancient trade merchants had to cover long distances in their journeys, so if they were not convinced that a safe transaction was possible, they simply did not bother to visit distant places. Leaders of regions that housed marketplaces also minimized their intervention in the activities around these marketplaces, and tried to provide all the accommodations the traders required.
The ports for foreign trade of Guya-guk and Geumgwan Gaya were possibly located in Bonghwang-Dae and Jangyu-Myeon, areas far from the chiefs" palaces. It suggests a policy of neutral external trade ports in the period from the 1st century BCE to the 4th century CE. Geumgwan Gaya of Gimhae controlled the alliance"s negotiations, and minimized its members intervention with regard to the running of marketplaces. In other words, the neutrality of marketplaces was both established and honored.
The ports for foreign trade of Guya-guk and Geumgwan Gaya were possibly located in Bonghwang-Dae and Jangyu-Myeon, areas far from the chiefs" palaces. It suggests a policy of neutral external trade ports in the period from the 1st century BCE to the 4th century CE. Geumgwan Gaya of Gimhae controlled the alliance"s negotiations, and minimized its members intervention with regard to the running of marketplaces. In other words, the neutrality of marketplaces was both established and honored.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 西歐學界의 交易場 이론
Ⅲ. 3~4세기 金海 지역의 交易港
Ⅳ. 交易政策과 聯盟體制
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-911-000603824