지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores the implications of the Sega(世家, noble family history) section of the 〈Kory?sa(高麗史, History of Kory?)〉 from the standpoint of cultural history. In this regard, the main focus is on the fact that the Sega were included in the biographical-thematic historical work known as 〈Kory?sa(高麗史, History of Kory?)〉 compiled during early Chos?n instead of the Pon"gi(本紀, basic annals) This study attempts to prove that such a decision was based on the authors’ own interpretations and ‘creative choices’ rather than an ‘automatic routine’ based on the need for ‘legitimacy.’ The implications of these decisions are also examined.
Tributary states outside of China placed great importance on their legitimacy as vassal states. To this end, while being ‘strongly’ aware that Pon"gi was a type of work dealing with the chronicles of emperors, these states opted to compile historical records based on biographical-thematic style historical materials. In this regard, the matter of how to organize the sections of a historical material was one that had multiple rather than one exact answer. This is evidenced by a detailed look at cafes that emerged during the timeframe spanning from the final period of Kory? to the late Chos?n period. This study focuses on the following: the establishment of the culture and institutions needed to maintain legitimacy as a vassal state outside of China never occurred in a passive manner; moreover, the non-negotiational characteristics of such works were never completed in an expedient manner. These were in fact regarded as creative works in which such states ‘own’ judgments and decisions played an active role. Furthermore, this study highlighted the potential disputes and arguments that lay in such answers reached based on their ‘own’ interpretations of difficult points, a denouement that originated from their adherence to the status of vassal state.
Tributary states outside of China placed great importance on their legitimacy as vassal states. To this end, while being ‘strongly’ aware that Pon"gi was a type of work dealing with the chronicles of emperors, these states opted to compile historical records based on biographical-thematic style historical materials. In this regard, the matter of how to organize the sections of a historical material was one that had multiple rather than one exact answer. This is evidenced by a detailed look at cafes that emerged during the timeframe spanning from the final period of Kory? to the late Chos?n period. This study focuses on the following: the establishment of the culture and institutions needed to maintain legitimacy as a vassal state outside of China never occurred in a passive manner; moreover, the non-negotiational characteristics of such works were never completed in an expedient manner. These were in fact regarded as creative works in which such states ‘own’ judgments and decisions played an active role. Furthermore, this study highlighted the potential disputes and arguments that lay in such answers reached based on their ‘own’ interpretations of difficult points, a denouement that originated from their adherence to the status of vassal state.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 『고려사』 세가 편목 낯설게 하기
Ⅲ. 『고려사』 세가 편목 설정의 창의성과 잠정성
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (84)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-911-000613428